where is the worst place to live in England?
I would have to say barnsley is the worst place I have visited, closely followed by anywhere else in yorkshire
middlesbrough is not too bad , it's the people. yarm is worse they all think they live in beverly hills. it's a crappy town next to stockton full of morons
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
From personal experience, I have found Nottingham, Manchester and Hull to be the worst, but even these places have benefits of living there and nice areas.
An ongoing poll on the Channel 4 website that asks people to rate where they live from one to five (five being the best) shows that Barking was voted the worst, closely followed by Blackpool, Newham, Huddersfield and Luton. The link below lists the 15 other towns that make up the 20 worst areas to live in, as voted by people who live there. Hope this helped :)
- sneadLv 44 years ago
that's in reality a query of private style of direction. One guy or woman's paradise is yet another's hell. many human beings value the Lake District (Cumbria) - answer above as between the main captivating and acceptable places to stay in England. My worst are:- Milton Keynes Slough Stevenage Hatfield Stoke On Trent Southampton Portsmouth Birmingham Peterborough Manchester Liverpool Newcastle Rhyl Bracknell Basildon Romford Shoeburyness
- MikeyLv 41 decade ago
I would like Roddysul to change his answer. The question is worst places in ENGLAND. Last time I checked Merthyr Tydfil and Blaenau gwent were in Wales. I think the worst place I have been to would be Bristol. It's so boring and chav-tastic
- Anonymous1 decade ago
according to a 2007 survey which looked at various factors these are the worst
Middlesbrough: Worst Place To Live
Kingston upon Hull: 2nd Worst
Newham: 3rd Worst
Nottingham: 4th Worst
Merthyr Tydfil: 5th Worst
North East Lincolnshire: 6th Worst
Islington: 7th Worst
Blaenau Gwent: 8th Worst
Mansfield: 9th Worst
Knowsley: 10th Worst
Blackpool: 11th Worst
Hackney: 12th Worst
Stoke-on-Trent: 13th Worst
Barking & Dagenham: 14th Worst
Doncaster: 15th Worst
Cannock Chase: 16th Worst
Manchester: 17th Worst
Haringey: 18th Worst
Burnley: 19th Worst
Hartlepool: 20th Worst
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- DizzybynameLv 61 decade ago
It would be hard to say unless you've been to every place in England, but of the places I've been I'd go for London, nice to visit but I'd hate to stay there.
Amery needs to check out the question again... Edinburghs in Scotland!
- 1 decade ago
It comes down to what you have and what you want. After living in rural Cornwall for years I would love the crowds and atmosphere of a city like London. Althought my twin brother whos lives in london really enjoys coming to cornwall to visit. From my experience, people always want what they dont have!
- FizzLv 51 decade ago
- 1 decade ago
Probably Hull or Nottingham
- HJLv 41 decade ago
of the places i've visited, the ones i'd least like to go back to (let alone live at) were Warrington and Ironbridge
- PollyLv 61 decade ago
London I would suspect.
Its nice to go but fantastic to leave behind!