Why are you taking in user-friendly terms those 2 characteristics? Why no longer take a extra complete team of characteristics. 2d, you're defining "extra suited" as "bodily more desirable" and then asking why adult adult males are "extra suited" -- no SANE man or woman would imagine that bodily more desirable is extra suited than each and every thing else that folk are. Are you speaking about animals, mammals, or people? I ask because the memories are not a similar for all of those communities. In a good number of animal species, women are plenty larger; in some, adult males are basically sperm-shipping gadgets. between mammals, in maximum species, adult males are larger -- many times through so a lot more desirable than that distinction in people. yet going lower back to my significant aspect, adult adult males, as a set, in user-friendly terms have "an earnings" the position actual ability is an advantage; in very few contexts. basically because taller people can attain the optimal cabinets, doesn't propose they have reward in another interest or component of existence.