拆彈雄心有冇違反軍事邏輯?

電影拆彈雄心劇情有乜係唔合符軍事邏輯?

4 Answers

Rating
  • Gary
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    1. Why people are near the bombsite? They should be evacuated.

    2. Why a SFC William James got hit by SGT J. T. Sanborn (Second dismantle outside UN Building) as SGT Sanborn is technically hitting a superior officer?

    3. Why EOD knows how to operate Barrett (The sniper rifle)?

    4. Where are the alcohol coming from?

  • 1 decade ago

    裝備計槍都少左d野

    冇lam,ARMY槍燈果到好似得m95/m96系,唔會唔用光纖版既ACOG,M2鏡有放

    大功能

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    啱啱睇完套戲,小弟唔知樓上仁兄講既野及戲中演員所做既係唔係實情,但有幾樣野我想講下。

    首先,戲中炸彈經常放正係路中心,四周係密集既建築物,醒少少既都知呢個係一個局,疏散平民當然係正確,但既然附近平民已全部被疏散,又有拆彈機械人,點解仲要派個人去逐條線去剪來拆彈﹖戲中美軍好似有神功護體,完全不怕炸彈附近建築物有狙擊手埋伏。既然炸彈附近已經無人有危險,點解唔用迫擊砲彈或大口徑機槍直接射近個炸彈等佢自然爆炸﹖反而要搵成班人條命去搏﹖

    另外鬥狙擊嗰PART都幾有趣。狙擊槍無話一定要狙擊手先用得,戲中SANBORN中士眼界不好自然合符邏輯。但最有趣既係兩班美軍係嗰幕開頭係一個徹底開放既平地上吹水打牙較,從無唸過好有可能有可能被人伏擊,如果咁既情況係真,咁我勸美軍真係番屋企度假好過。跟住兩邊鬥放冷槍,SANBORN中士明顯唔夠對面勁,仲要膽粗粗同對面搵命搏,一個人勇到咁真係無野好講。臨尾最好笑既係負責睇水嗰個傻仔,對面明顯玩穿插包抄,仲要真係比人穿插到自己後方,跟住仲要問人好唔好開槍!最正既係SANBORN中士辣低兩件後竟然唔捨得走係都要同個死剩種磨爛蓆,如果美軍真係有咁高作戰意志既軍人就真係美軍之福。

    如果講落去,套戲自然仲有好多唔係咁MAKE SENSE既地方。但呢套戲總體來講其實拍得好好,因為佢無太戲劇性既爆炸場面及英勇事蹟,而當中既美軍無論係裝備、手法及當地環境同媒體報導比大家既印象都幾吻合,起碼你唔會覺得佢好假,所以我覺得佢抽贏阿凡達絕對實至名歸,我亦推介大家睇呢套戲。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.