Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentOther - Politics & Government · 1 decade ago

Can Obama rightly be Called a Marxist AND a Neo-Conservative?

Before you answer, please keep in mind that virtually all the Neo-Conservatives at AEI and at AIPAC, and in the Rumsfeld Pentagon, and at The New Republic (Kristol pere et fils) started out in the 1950's and 1960's as radical left wing socialists. They were the American communists, and then they claimed to see the light, and became the radical "NEO-CONSERVATIVES" which in fact are no kind of conservatives at all, but actually are globalist, zionist, communists who agree with no part of George Washington's ideas about keeping clear of foreign entanglements, and no part of Barry Goldwater's idea about the primacy of the individual rather than the collective in this democratic republic USA.

Is Obama a globalist? Yes, he is.

Is Obama a free trader? Yes he is.

Is Obama following in the footsteps of G.W. Bush in coddling the NYC Bankers and Hedge Fund Managers and obscenely greedy monsters of America killing job exportation to China?

Yes he is.

Is Obama failing to regulate the banks and credit card companies and allowing them to operate under Wild Wild West rules just like G.W. Bush?

Yes he is. Donna Baird notwithstanding, Obama is mainly about making speeches, his deeds in the area of regulation of the financial industry are a big fat Zero. He loves Henry Paulson and Tim Geithner. He loves Goldman Sachs (the main beneficiary of the AIG $300 Billion bailout). $50 million bonuses are being paid out again on Wall Street -- it's business as usual.

The Marxist features of Obama are too obvious to require extended narration. Obamacare is plainly a Marxist plot to take over 1/6th of the US economy. His Justice Department (Eric Holder) has proceeded down ACLU/Marxist lines particularly in closing Gitmo and doing the trial of KSM in a civilian court in Manhattan. How about throwing $100 Billion at the Global Warming Copenhagen Conferences. How about the Meals-On-Wheels warfare rules of engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan? How about Cap and Trade. How about his Department of Education? Plainly the man is a Marxist.

Were Marxist and Neo-Conservative EVER separate ideas? Weren't the NEO-CONSERVATIVES just Marxists in deep camo all along --- they claimed to be reformed from their views in the 1950's and 1960's but they actually never reformed at all. One world. Wendell Wilkie saw it. Woodrow Wilson saw it. The zionists see it.

Not Goldwater, not George Washington, not Pat Buchanan -- these are the actual conservatives.

The NEOs are just a ruse, false flagging, deception, disinformation, agitprop. Obama and Rham Emanuel fit right in, Axelrod is just a groupie, he is lost in space, Valerie same thing, Biden is getting dragged along, he's not sure where.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    No, just a Marxist.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 4 years ago

    He's nationalized GM and AIG, he wishes to nationalize our health care system, control energy through cap in trade. That's controlling the means of production. He said it's good to "spread the wealth around". These are the foundations of communism. He also has a number of self-proclaimed Marxist and Maoists in his cabinet and serving as Czars. He went to a self proclaimed Marxist minister for 20 years and was friend of a Marxist terrorist in Bill Ayers. So basically he's a Marxist because of the people he surrounds himself with, his rhetoric, and his policies. All Marxists are Communists.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    ok, crazy rant, ya whatever. The whole socialist thing was started when Obama told some Ohioan skinhead plumber that he wanted to "spread the wealth around", and thus on inherent fallacy. Spreading the wealth around is not in fact a socialist concept. True socialism plain and simply doesn't care where the wealth is as long as the necessities (including the necessity of happiness) are met for the majority. the accessibility of wealth by all members of society is in fact actually a capitalist concept and is the reason why the founding fathers broke ties with the top dogs of the European mercantilie system of the time.

    edit: and btw, Cheyney and Republicans are actually a lot closer to communism than you probably currently realize.

    http://www.romm.org/soc_com.html.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He is not a Marxist, but possibly a neo-con lite. He has a high tolerance for the welfare state and good appetite.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Tom R
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    i can tell by your post that you are very educated but you are also very wrong. neocons are fascists. i think you have to say that karl rove is their poster child an he is a firm nixon republican who believes in unlimited presidential power. dictatorship kind of power. marxism is commonly used interchangably with this but they are quite different. if you look at W its quite obvious that he viewed himself as a king. . when opponents disobeyed like valerie plame or the dixie chicks their were repercussions. i think the one common thread that one can say about obamas presidency is his work to get cooperation on both sides. bush just labeled the dems as traitors an steamrolled over them. since you apparently dont believe in global warming i hope you live on the coast. i believe it is very sad that an intellligent person like yourself cant recognize the difference between obama who is a statesman working to improve the country. an the neocons who are looking to create the world of the book 1984 here now.

    Source(s): nixon an now rove believe the mistake that nixon made was that he didnt control the press. the press broke the watergate story an publicized the anti vietnam sentiment. now we have the neocon network fox an an overwhelming number of papers that are controlled by the same ideology.
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    so, you are asking if it's possible for the president to be both a radical rightist and a radical leftist at the same time?

    no.

    obama isn't even liberal - or we would be discussing a robust public option and a single payor healthcare system.

    he's a centrist.

    none of the above.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    By all appearances, Obama is Marxist alright -- and was for many years. The neo-Conservatism crept up on him within a year in the office...

    =The NEOs are just a ruse, false flagging,

    =deception, disinformation, agitprop. Obama

    Yada-yada...

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    None of the above is true. Get your facts straight. Stop negativeness and get serious call all you know and vote to have congress to quit stalling and pass health-care.

    God Bless You!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Rob
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    So you think Cheney and the neo-cons are secretly Communists? You've really lost it.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Your question is an interesting mix of thoughtful analysis and paranoid lunacy.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.