You know, you're name could NOT be any less truthful! You clearly possess NO common sense! But in your world of delusion and mental onanism it's science against religion, eh? Okay, I take up your gauntlet, my good fellow!
Over there is a rock of unknown age. By "unknown," let me be clear that I mean that this rock predates ANY new human knowledge of its origins or age. Got it? Now, along comes Mr. Smartypants, whom I'm guessing is your cousin. He "explains" this theory of carbon dating then applies his theory to that rock and says that it's 1.3 million years old.
And you sir, say ... "Wow! You're a genious! HOW did you do that?" NOW ... help me out Mr. Common Sense.... If no one knows what is the RIGHT answer then how can we check the results of this so-called "scientific" carbon-dating? I'm just saying ... you don't know; yet, you choose to believe! Your faith--if I can use that word that is so shockingly disdainful--is in science; i.e., it is your faith that makes you believe, NOT the proof. For in fact there is NO PROOF that carbon dating is accurate! In fact, there is MUCH evidence that it's not accurate!
Now ... let's skip merrily over to your pet subject of evolution. Carbon dating was just a teaser. A warm up, if you will? Evolution is according to MISTER Common Sense "proved" by "science ... to be a fact."
Obviously you are a little intoxicated! Let's CLARIFY that there are AT LEAST two types of evolution in question:
1. Micro-evolution: Species changing over time; e.g., nature favoring taller people who marry other taller people for centuries. CONCEPTUALLY, eventually shorter people would become fewer and fewer to the point of eventual extinction. Micro-evolution.
2. MACRO-evolution: Species changing sooooooooooooooooo radically that they become ... well, new species. It's species hopping.
There is ALSO the entire saga of how the world came to be, LIFE came to be, how EVOLUTION changed that life over time, to the point of the world we have today. REMEMBER ... this tale denies God!!! This tale says for example that the big bang just spontaneous happened. IF it had a cause, it sure wasn't God! This tale says that once conditions became right that life was sustainable that life spontaneously happened. Again ... WHATEVER caused life to spontaneously happen, it sure wasn't God!!!
There was that first primordial slime, which is this manifestation of the spontaneous birth of life. I frankly have no idea why under this tale of intrigue OTHER life forms couldn't just spontaneously come to be, but no! It's your lie; so, you get to tell it your way! ALL LIFE supposedly evolved from this first life.
I believe classic Darwin "proof" of this was the startling similarities between bird wing bones, the bones of animal paws, and the hands of the so-called "human animals." I admit that there ARE similarities; I simply ask: "Why couldn't God have simply chosen to use variations on the same design? Isn't it utilitarian?" If Darwin were alive today, he'd be like ... "Huh? Uh ... well, uh ... I have to go to the bathroom."
But YOU, Mr. Common Sense, SURELY see that IF there were an almighty God that He in fact COULD HAVE designed the bird's wing, the animal's paw, and the human's hand of similar design! YOU Mr. Common Sense must admit that there's NOTHING in this so called proof that precludes a God or truly proves evolution!
FURTHER ... we ask the simplest "common sensical" questions. Has science EVER proved that life can just spontaneously come to be, simply because conditions are right?
How is it that evolution supposedly explains the fauna path of life but the flora is ignored? Do bananas and apes share a common ancestor? How is it that MALES and FEMALES both supposedly evolved? How is it that PART of this evolutionary process was built in a reproductive cycle? HOW did these various life forms figure out that hey! if we do this, we can make babies?
I mean, are you SERIOUS that you think that from a primoridial slime came males and females of DIFFERENT reproductive systems playing out different roles and that somehow evolution "told" the creatures to mate? LOL!!!
To hear the average schmuck tell it, there's A missing link to evolutionary theory. I would like to point out to you, being Mr. Common Sense, that even ONE missing link is sufficient to conclude that evolutionary THEORY is NOT scientific fact, but in fact there are MANY missing links!
Show me the science that could possibly explain how ALL life came to be from that first life! Keep in mind the myriad ways that things reproduce! Explain scientifically of course how that first life came to be. Explain the big bang! Explain how evolution took care of reproduction and just answer me this ...
IF evolution as a system is so damned smart that it can on its own create males and females of each species ABLE to reproduce then why wouldn't evolution just keep producing mor