Which US Presidents were elected through plurality vote but not majority vote?
- Anonymous1 decade agoBest Answer
Presidents Elected Without a Majority
Fifteen candidates (three of them twice) have become president of the United States with a popular vote less than 50% of the total cast. It should be noted, however, that in elections before 1872, presidential electors were not chosen by popular vote in all states. Adams's election in 1824 was by the House of Representatives, which chose him over Jackson, who had a plurality of both electoral and popular votes, but not a majority in the electoral college.
Besides Jackson in 1824, only three other candidates receiving the largest popular vote have failed to gain a majority in the electoral college—Samuel J. Tilden (D) in 1876, Grover Cleveland (D) in 1888, and Al Gore (D) in 2000.
The “minority” presidents are listed below.
Year President Electoral percent Popular percent
1824 John Q. Adams 31.8% 29.8%
1844 James K. Polk (D) 61.8 49.3
1848 Zachary Taylor (W) 56.2 47.3
1856 James Buchanan (D) 58.7 45.3
1860 Abraham Lincoln (R) 59.4 39.9
1876 Rutherford B. Hayes (R) 50.1 47.9
1880 James A. Garfield (R) 57.9 48.3
1884 Grover Cleveland (D) 54.6 48.8
1888 Benjamin Harrison (R) 58.1 47.8
1892 Grover Cleveland (D) 62.4% 46.0%
1912 Woodrow Wilson (D) 81.9 41.8
1916 Woodrow Wilson (D) 52.1 49.3
1948 Harry S. Truman (D) 57.1 49.5
1960 John F. Kennedy (D) 56.4 49.7
1968 Richard M. Nixon (R) 56.1 43.4
1992 William J. Clinton (D) 68.8 43.0
1996 William J. Clinton (D) 70.4 49.0
2000 George W. Bush (R) 50.3 47.8
2004 George W. Bush (R) 53 50.7Source(s): http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781456.html
- MikeLv 71 decade ago
William Jefferson Clinton was the last in 1992, with Ross Perot getting 20 million votes, but not one electoral vote.
- merickelLv 43 years ago
The U.N. is a disfunctional organisation. who's to assert which 5 helpful worldwide places have the best suited to veto resolutions, however the different 185 could desire to stay with it? Does France even need to be a variety of five anymore? the worldwide has replaced lots as a results of fact the tip of WWII. the way the U.N. operates must be redesigned so as that worldwide places have equivalent representation and say in how the U.N. is administered. we could desire to continuously get rid of "veto means" altogether. i'm fascinated in democracy, even yet it is complicated whilst we can't even agree no count if to punish Iran or no longer for attempting to construct nuclear weapons as a results of fact Russia and China are status interior the way! How pathetic is that? as that's on the instant, the U.N. is a waste of money and it isn't any longer doing something to sparkling up the worldwide's issues. in simple terms my opinion.