I think Big Show and Kane have pretty close and identical careers. Honestly, I think Kane had a bigger career. I wouldn't say they are big legends. The only difference between the two is that Big Show was out for nearly 2 years. I know it should be more about quality than quantity, but Kane is much more respected than Big Show because he never got a world championship match. Big Show might be a multiple time world champion, but Kane is much better than Big Show. Kane has been in great feuds with Undertaker, Shane McMahon, RVD, X-Pac and many more. I would say Big Show's prime and only good feuds were with Eddie Guerrero, Undertaker, Brock Lesnar and Kurt Angle, other than that, there hasn't been much for the Big Show
EDIT To Edge: Dude, what don't you understand, I know that he got a WWF Championship against Austin in the First Blood Match, but for 1 night and I know he was ECW Champion. It's called sarcasm. Compared to Big Show, Kane hasn't gotten much championship opportunities. Lets look, Kane's last World championship was like what in a Elimination Chamber match the beginning of this year, Big Show just got another shot at the title, oh wait, wasn't Big Show also part of the MAIN EVENT of Wrestlemania, not only that but he was one of the big 4 superstars Smackdown had in 2002-2003. So to the user "Edge", mind your own business. I'm not saying Kane never actually won a World title, I'm saying that Big Show has more opportunities.