栗子
Lv 5
栗子 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

(英文) seem 變化寫法 以及幾個句子

題目附解答

從家中亂七八糟的情形看來,這竊賊似乎已翻遍了每樣東西.

Judging from the complete mess in the house, it seemed that the burglar had been through everything.

1.請問為何中間不用連接詞? 怎樣的句型可以這樣寫而不需要連接詞的運用

2.是否能改寫成?

...in the house, the burglar seemed to have been through everything.

題目附解答

然而,令我鬆一口氣的是,這竊賊想必認為我不會笨到將貴重物品放置在如此明顯之處.

To my relief, however, the burglar must have taken it for granted that I would not be so stupid as to leave something so valuable in such an obvious place.

3.本題上一段是說把物品放在鬧鐘旁 這邊為何不用at or on 而要用 in?

4.leave something so valuable 中的leave yahoo字典中沒有放置的意思啊. 為何這邊用leave?

用 leave valuable things 不是比leave something so valuable 簡單?

leave something so valuable 看起來怪怪的. 變成 v + n +adv +adj 不是應該把n(something)放在adj後嘛?

Update:

您說 ...in 在 內 看 不到 地方 [不明顯 ]

那貴重物品放置在如此明顯之處 怎麼還會用 in ?

1 Answer

Rating
  • chen
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    1.請問為何中間不用連接詞? 怎樣的句型可以這樣寫而不需要連接詞的運用

    ....是分詞片語 [Judging .....house不可以用 連接詞

    2.是否能改寫成?

    ...in the house, the burglar seemed to have been through everything.

    ....是可以但不明確

    3.本題上一段是說把物品放在鬧鐘旁 這邊為何不用at or on 而要用 in?

    .....in 在 內 看 不到 地方 [不明顯 ] 貴重物品放置在如此明顯之處

    .....at 在固定看到地方 [ 明顯 ]

    .....on .. 在上面看到的地方 [ 明顯 ]

    4 用 leave valuable things 不是比leave something so valuable 簡單?

    leave 是 及物動詞要接 名詞

    .............. [ so valuable 是在形容 something]

    ................................................. 要在名 詞之後

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.