俊諺 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

英文高手幫忙翻Paper...(勿使用翻譯軟體 感恩)

The study has shown that the executives working in this

specific Brazilian cluster have an unbalance in their personal

values profile; and, even worse, is the fact that the political

orientation, which has partially to do with the process of

influencing people, that is to say leadership, received the

lowest average score (10.28). This finding can be partially

explained, as said before, due to the fact that the great

majority of the executives of the sample (72%) belongs to the

Generation X (Zamke et al., 2000), the survival generation

with a casual approach to authority, and, on the other hand,

the political value is associated with politics, which is

somewhat “dirty” for the majority of the Brazilian citizens. In

any way this is the moment to face this problem. If we really

want to have leaders with traits such as: responsible

influence, people centered, showing coherence between

attitudes and actions, and fecundity, that is to say, leading

the process of assuring progress, then we need to work hard in

order to develop knowledge to better understand and

influence leaders' personal values.

The results of leadership style flexibility and leadership

effectiveness lead us to the conclusion that this group of

executives needs to receive training in terms of leadership

skills, once they need to have more flexibility of styles and to

be able to use the appropriate style depending on the

situation. Previous studies (Hersey et al., 2001) suggest that

by having this new profile this group of executives will be

able to lead their organizations towards better results.

Once the study uncovered the high positive relation between

executives' personal values balance and leadership effectiveness,

as well as, executives' personal values balance and

organization effectiveness, would be highly recommended in

leadership development efforts to take into consideration a

critical analysis on personal values' balance, once all the

value orientations used in the study are important, so all of

them needed to be valued.

1 Answer

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Best Answer

    這項研究表明,工作人員在這

    具體巴西集群有一個不平衡個人

    價值配置;而更糟糕的是,政治

    方向,這部分是與過程

    影響人,即領導,收到了

    最低平均得分(10.28)。這一發現可以部分

    解釋說,正如前面所說的,因為事實上,偉大的

    多數高管樣本(72%)屬於

    X一代(Zamke等。,2000年),一代人的生存

    以休閒方式當局的身份,另一方面,

    在政治價值和政治相關聯,這是

    有點“臟”的多數巴西公民。在

    任何方式,這是目前必須正視這個問題。如果我們真的

    希望有領導人與特徵,如:負責

    影響,以人為本,展示之間的一致性

    態度和行動,並生育能力,這就是說,領導

    保證的進程取得進展,那麼我們需要努力工作的

    為了發展知識,以更好地理解和

    影響領導者的個人價值。

    ========================================================

    結果領導作風和領導的靈活性

    效力使我們的結論是,這一組

    管理人員需要接受培訓方面的領導

    技能,一旦他們需要有更大的靈活性和風格

    能使用適當的方式取決於

    情況。以往的研究(赫西等。,2001)表明,

    透過這項新的配置這一群體的管理人員將

    能夠帶領他們的組織向更好的結果。

    =========================================================

    一旦研究發現高呈正相關關係

    主管的個人價值的平衡和領導效能,

    以及,高級管理人員的個人價值的平衡,

    組織效能,將是非常建議

    領導力發展的努力考慮到一

    關鍵分析個人價值'的平衡,一旦所有的

    價值取向用於研究是重要的,因此所有的

    他們需要重視。

    =========================================================

    希望對你有所幫助

    Source(s): 自己
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.