6/10 9/11 commission report writers admitted that the report was a whitewash. Where is this article?

Question

I've heard this many times but can't find information on it.

Answer 1

Favorite Answer

For yours,

and Neonerd's consideration:

some checkable statements from 9/11 commissioners:

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”.

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only “the first draft” of history.

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “We purposely put together a staff that had - in a way - conflicts of interest“.

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

Answer 2

Read the 9/11 Commission Report. Books a million has this book and you will be surprised what all the government knew before hand on 9/11 and didn't prevent this. the book will really P*&&ss you off.

Answer 3

On the anniversary of 9/11 I listened to the reports and people had more information that they should have before they should have. The Prez sitting for a long time doing nothing after hearing simply "the nation is under attack" seems to prove he knew already what was up. Otherwise he might have asked a question or two like..."do I have time to finish up with these kids? What kind of an attack?... since a bomb might have just detonated in Manhattan..Check these out and decide for yourself...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZBmfRBv-Go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRtsJEVp-p0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SorWFvugBs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

Answer 4

one place you will see that is in the book The Ground Truth by John Farmer, Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission. http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.php?name=News...

Answer 5

R J Lee Group Expert Report.

"Spherical iron and spherical or vesicular silicate particles that result from exposure to high temperature (Figure 2 E and Figure 2 F)

Page 11

http://www.ae911truth.org/documents/WTCDustSignatu...

Also,

Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade

Center destruction

RJ Lee report provides an image of a “vesicular alumino-silicate particle” which exemplifies the “round open porous structure having a Swiss cheese appearanceas a result ofboiling and evaporation”

page 7

4.3. Molybdenum spherule in the USGS data set

page 5

4.2. Volatilized lead

page 5

6. Discussion

The temperatures required for the observed spherule-formation and evaporation of materials observed in the WTC dust (table 1) are significantly higher than temperatures reachable by the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings (table 2). The temperatures required to melt iron (1,538 °C) and molybdenum

(2,623 °C), and to vaporize lead (1,740 °C) and aluminosilicates (~2,760°C), are completely out of reach of thefires in the WTC buildings (maximum 1,100 °C).

Page 10

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHig...

Now what ya got?

So answer the question loser.

Where did the heat come from, documented by the RJ Lee Group, Vetted by the Insurance Companies, All 4 paid the 130 Liberty St. policies.

"By the end of 2002, Deutsche Bank decided the building was unsalvageable. After spending $33 million to test roughly 60,000 samples throughout the building, the bank's experts, "RJ Lee Group", concluded that, as a Deutsche Bank legal filing later put it, "a combination of contaminants known to be hazardous to human health, in quantities and concentrations unparalleled in any other building designed for office use, permeates the entire structure at levels which exceed by up to thousands of times the levels considered appropriate for Class A office buildings."

Deutsche Bank demanded that its four insurers pay its total policy value of $1.7 billion. Two of them, Chubb (CB, Fortune 500) and Zurich, quickly settled

Sure enough, in February 2004, Mitchell announced a deal. The LMDC would buy the building for $90 million and assume responsibility for a $45 million contract to take it down. The insurers paid Deutsche Bank $140 million and agreed to cover 75% of any costs above the $45 million assumed by the LMDC

http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/19/news/companies/gro...

The Insurers paid, based on the RJ Lee Expert Report, that Documents Temps of 5,000 F

Where did the heat, I just displayed for everyone, come from?

Answer 6

Charlie Sheen is reviewing before he gives it to give to Obama.

Answer 7

There's no information on it because they never claimed this. Amazing how often truthers seem to resort to lies.