Anonymous
Anonymous asked in SportsCricket · 1 decade ago

Mitchell Johnson vs. Dale Steyn?

Arguably the two best fast bowlers in the world. But....

Who's the better bowler?

Who's the better batsman?

Who's the better fielder?

Who's got the better future?

Argue all you want!

21 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Mitchell Johnson for all of it but got to say Dale Steyn is a good bowler

    Mitchell Johnson bowling average 28.80 (test) 24.63 (odi)

    Dale Steyn bowling average 23.70 (test) 27.81 (odi)

    Mitchell Johnson batting average 30.73 (test) 8.38 (odi)

    Dale Steyn batting average 11.90 (test) 4.00 (odi)

    Source(s): kool kool
    • Login to reply the answers
  • Sarah
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Who's the better bowler?

    Steyn. He's more penetrative more often.

    Who's the better batsman?

    Without a doubt it's Mitchell Johnson. He has more batting talent and with a Test average of 30.73 has become a very good allrounder.

    Who's the better fielder?

    They're both about the same.

    Who's got the better future?

    As long as both stay injury free and in form then they both have great futures.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Mitchell Johnson is the best in all categories.

    Johnson has a century in tests whereas Steyn does not even have a hlf century.

    Johnson doesnt have the pace that Steyn has but however Johnson is consistent than Steyn.Steyn did have an imressive start to his career but he lacks consistency.

    Johnson is the taller among both and is a better fielder.

    So all the above show that Johnson has a better future.Alredy,we all know how Ponting gave him the primary responsibility in the absence of Brett Lee,besides his batting also adds up useful runs to the teams tally..Johnson is better according to me.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Better bowler- Steyn

    Batsman- Johnson

    Fielder- Johnson

    Future- Steyn

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Steyn is the better bowler. Johnson is the better the batsman. Both have great futures

    • Login to reply the answers
  • johno
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Hey Gocha my friend you obviously didn't watch the MCG test last december if you say Steyn hasn't scored a century. He scored 76 in 180 partnership with Duminy(166) to steer SA to their first ever test series win in AUS. So to say Steyn is better bowler and Johnson a better batman. Both are young and their future looks very bright

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Better Bowler - Mitch

    Better Batsman - Def Mitch

    Better fielder - Undoubtedly Mitch

    Better Future - Mitch

    Who's faster - Mitch

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Steyn is a better bowler, Johnston is a better batter, Fielding is about equal, I'd say Johnson has the better future since he looks like moving into an allrounder role rather than just being in the side for his bowling.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Who's the better bowler? : DS

    Who's the better batsman? MJ

    Who's the better fielder?DS

    Who's got the better future?DS

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    JOHNNO by far is the better, I DON'T think Styne is.Since the start of the Indian tour JOHNNO has bowled well over 600 over and still maintain his pace.His batting is better, comparing the two averages of course. His skills as a fielder, superb to watch.Who has the better future MITCHELL JOHNSON of course.

    Source(s): Iam a cricket tragic!
    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.