Why do you bots keep saying that all 14th amendment citizens are natural born citizens, when the man who wrote?

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. John Bingham confirms that understanding and the construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:"[4] [5] [6] “ [I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61... show more The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868.

John Bingham confirms that understanding and the construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:"[4] [5] [6]
“ [I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…. . . ”

- John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866 (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))
Update: the 14th amendment, John Bingham, says that natural born citizen are born of two US citizen parents in-country?
Update 2: Prester, umm so do 7 supreme court precedents such as Minor v. Happersett which not only states NBC is jus soli jus sanguinis (both parents) but also, that any 14th amendment US citizen can never be a natural born citizen
8 answers 8