Just because the White House and CNN agree Obama's birth certificate controversy is "nonsense" is it really?
In August of 1959 Hawaii became a US State. They needed a way to account for everyone already born who was now a US citizen. So, they used Birth Certificates for those born after 1959 and they used "Certifications of Live Birth" (COLB) to account for those born earlier than August 1959.
Basically, in a Birth Certificate it is filled out by the Dr/hospital and gives the name of the hospital the baby was born at, The Dr's name, height/weight etc.
And a "Certification of Live Birth" is made by the parents or subject filling out the info to the best of their ability. If that info is wrong on the Certificate of Live Birth, it is rarely caught, the people said it happened so they are believed. It also doesn't ask for the Dr, hospital, height/weight etc.
Now, Obama provides us with a copy of his "Certificate of Live Birth" and as Snopes.com proves, it is real. Official.
But, WHY did he give a "COLB" and not his REAL birth certificate showing the Dr. and hospital? He was born in August of 1961 which was 2 years after Hawaii became a state, why did he even have a "COLB"? If he was really born in Hawaii, there MUST be a "birth certificate" as well. Right?
Obama has NOT shown us that REAL birth certificate yet. The one the hospital filed supposedly. The one that gives us a way to verify his birth with a Dr's name and hospital name.
All we have is a form where the info was filled out by the parents. They could have said anything and it's still a legal document whether or not it's true.
There are a LOT of uanswered questions yet we are told to "forget about it"? Why? Why can't we get a copy of the original birth certificate, the Dr's name or even the hospital he was born at? Then ALL records could be checked immediately. Controversy over.
WHY don't we have that info? Anyone?