Why doesn't someone breed a hemp with 0% TCH content to make the lawmakers/bureaucrats happy?
Is it possible?
Would it change laws? Or is there some other reason that the government doesn't want cheap energy and resources? (*cough* companies and the capitalist system *cough* conspiracies etc. *cough*)
Why the hell would anyone (federal and some state government) be concerned with something that if you felt so inclined to smoke, might kill you and would produce no desirable effects in the first place?
What the hell ... -.- stupid everything
This is probably the ******* reason there is going to be a drought in California, deforestation and destruction of the watershed and whatnot. What the ****, seriously use hemp. Goddamn. >.<
- Nature BoyLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
There is already a 0% THC hemp. It is male plants. Only female plants contain THC.
Male hemp is used to make rope, high quality paper, and even cool clothing. I have a few hemp shirts (when they get dirty you don't have to wash them...just smoke them....LOL, LOL).
Seriously, hemp makes the absolute best rope in the entire world. It has many other great uses. The government should subsidize tobacco farmers to switch to growing male hemp.
- CelesteLv 41 decade ago
Because its not all about the THC...hemp is one of the strongest fibers ever. If they started using it like they could... dupont(plastics) and the logging industries would go under. I guarantee a lot of your top government officials have monies buried in those corporations.
- HankLv 51 decade ago
It's already in production for clothing and fibrous products.