In 1787- 1789, which of the following groups was most likely to oppose ratification of the Constitution?

A) Farmers in isolated areas

B) Export Merchants

C) Former officers in the continental army

D) Southern planters

E) Urban artisans

4 Answers

  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    A. When Amos Singletary, the rough-hewn farmer from Worcester County, Massachusetts rose before the state’s elected convention gathered in 1788 to decide on whether to ratify the Constitution, he spoke without benefit of any schooling. But standing behind the plow, he had developed a wealth of feelings and political instincts. Singletary may have appreciated that a written constitution was in itself a landmark event in the Western world, and he may have celebrated the fact that conventions of delegates elected by their constituents were charged with deciding on the wisdom of the document. These, after all, were breathtaking innovations in putting the power in the people--or, as was the case in Massachusetts, to give a say in political matters to about half the white adult males who qualified through property ownership.

    But gnawing at Singletary’s innards was something born of his lifelong experience with the men of wealth in western Massachusetts. He, like most debt-ridden farmers tilling marginal lands in New England, had just left behind a wrenching, blood-filled civil insurrection born out of desperation. “These lawyers, and men of learning, and moneyed men, that talk so finely, and gloss over matters so smoothly, to make us poor illiterate people swallow down the pill,” he sputtered, “expect to get into congress themselves; they expect to be managers of the Constitution and get all the power and all the money into their own hands, and then they will swallow up all of us little folks, like the great Leviathan. Mr. President; yes just as the whale swallowed up Jonah. This is what I am afraid of.”

    Singletary did not speak for all farmers and probably not for most of the commercially successful men of the plow. But he spoke for the hardscrabble families who eked out a living far from commercial markets. Such men toiled on the frontiers of the new nation, especially in the Appalachian hill country from Maine to Georgia. As small agricultural producers, they feared and hated what they regarded as moneyed, parasitical men who did not live by their own labor but handled money, speculated in land, bore hard on debtors to whom they made loans, and paid low taxes in relation to their wealth.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    have you ever finished your analyze? the respond is right here: Ratification became into no longer a foregone end. able, articulate adult adult males used newspapers, pamphlets, and public conferences to communicate ratification of the form. those widespread as Antifederalists adversarial the form for a sort of reasons. some persevered to argue that the delegates in Philadelphia had surpassed their congressional authority with the help of fixing the Articles of Confederation with an unlawful new rfile. Others complained that the delegates in Philadelphia represented purely the nicely-born few and as a result had crafted a rfile that served their specific pastimes and reserved the franchise for the propertied training. yet another customary objection became into that the form gave too lots ability to the effective government on the rate of the states and that a representative government could no longer handle a republic this massive. the main extreme complaint became into that the Constitutional convention had did no longer undertake a invoice of rights proposed with the help of George Mason. In ny, Governor George Clinton expressed those Antifederalist concerns in numerous printed newspaper essays under the pen call Cato, on an analogous time as Patrick Henry and James Monroe led the contest in Virginia. D.

  • 1 decade ago

    Farmers in isolated areas.

    (I'm pretty sure.)

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago


    for sure

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.