關於問卷的英文翻譯~ 需要你的協助~

關於問卷的英文 需要中文翻譯 不要用翻譯軟體唷

If an institution has generated or obtained a pool of items rather than adopted an entire instrument, care must be taken when selecting items on a piecemeal basis.

Use logical and empirical analysis to select individual items from a pool.

Logical analysis requires form developers to make subjective judgments in selecting appropriate items, whereas an empirical analysis requires that studies be conducted to determine the usability of the items.

The last step in the design and construction of the items and the questionnaire is organizing the items in the questionnaire.

Although there can be a fear of halo effects (favorably inflated responses) when putting such a questionnaire together, it is nonetheless best to make the questionnaire as simple and as easy-to-complete as possible.

If you must choose between possible halo effects and simplicity, choose simplicity.

For instance, although frequently reversing the endpoints on a scale might help reduce halo effects, it can sometimes lead to errors because it makes the questionnaire needlessly complex.

Questions need to be grouped, labeled, and organized for easy reading and answering, and according to how and where the responses should be placed.

There should be some negatively worded questions, and they should begin to appear early in the questionnaire to avoid mistakes that might be due to a positive response-set bias.

(That is, varying the wording keeps respondents from simply selecting the same response for every question.)

Negatively stated items can be useful, but only if they can be stated negatively in a coherent manner. Most questionnaire items can be grouped into subscales.

If the original grouping was done on a logical basis, then a statistical technique such as factor analysis can be used to confirm whether the grouped items represent a common construct.

If you have questions about how to lay out the feedback form, consult a skilled questionnaire developer.

Update:

也不要用線上翻譯啦><""

會翻錯

Update 2:

應該不會出現游泳池這句話吧@@"

1 Answer

Rating
  • 妮妮
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    如果一個機構已產生或獲得了一批項目,而不是通過一個完整的文書,必須注意在選擇項目上零零碎碎的基礎。

    使用邏輯和實證分析,選擇個別項目從游泳池。

    邏輯分析,就需要開發形式,使主觀判斷選擇適當的項目,而實證分析要求進行研究,以確定使用的物品。

    最後一個步驟的設計和建造的項目和組織的調查表中的項目調查表。

    雖然有可能是害怕光暈效果(積極誇大反應)時,把這樣一個調查表一起,但卻是最好的,使簡單的調查問卷和易於完成的。

    如果你必須選擇可能光暈效果和簡單,選擇簡單。

    例如,雖然經常扭轉端點的規模可能有助於減少光暈效果,它有時會導致錯誤,因為它使問卷不必要複雜。

    問題需要歸類,標記,並組織,便於閱讀和回答,並根據如何以及在何處的答复應放在。

    應該有一些消極的措辭問題,他們應該儘早開始出現在調查表中,以避免錯誤,可能是由於積極響應集偏見。

    (也就是說,不同的受訪者的措詞不斷從簡單選擇了同樣的答复的每一個問題。 )

    消極的物品可以說是有益的,但前提是他們可以說負面以協調一致的方式。大多數問卷項目可分為分量。

    如果原來的分組進行了合理的基礎上,那麼,統計方法,如因子分析可以用來確認是否分組項目代表了共同建設。

    如果您有任何問題,如何奠定了反饋表,徵求熟練問卷開發商.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.