跪求: 翻譯文章 我快虛脫了= =..

請高手幫我翻譯這篇文章:

前半段我已經翻好了 我也快掛了

The studios clearly recognize the value of getting exposure for their movies on such a heavily trafficked Web sitc. Marc Shmuger, chairman of Universal

Pictures, noted that his company's marketing team distributed promotional video clips of all its new fI Ims to Web sites such as YouTube. Of course, the studios could not expect users to voluntarily ignore illegal clips in favor of the approved ones, or even discern the difference between them. So, it made sense for the

movie industry 10 follow the lead of the music industry.

where the focus shifted from killing off illegal uploads to taking advantage of digital music as a new source of revenue.

What happens when the two sides ean't agree on terms? ln some cases, the studios have to tread lightly because of their diverse interests in the media. For

example. News Corporation also owns MySpace, which itself houses untold numbers of unauthorized music and video clips that are posted by users. The delicate balance between vigilance and public relations surfaced in

January 2007 when News Corporation filed a subpoena in a U.S. District Court to compel Google to turn over the identity of a user who uploaded episodes of the Fox

Television programs 24 and The Simpsolls to YouTube.

Fox was simply looking to protect its copyrights. but the network risked angering fans of the shows, as well as fans of YouTube, if it pursued the individual too aggressively. Moreover. News Corporation could come across as hypocritical for seeking to punish a YouTube user while so many of users of MySpace were pennitted to engage in the samc behavior.

1n early 2007, YouTube revealed its intention to explore a revenue-sharing model. By sharing revenue with content creators. YouTube might be able to return the focus of the site to its original purpose, and Steer users away from the practice of uploading their favorite copyrighted material. Metacafe and Revver. two other video-sharing sites. already had such models in place.

Update:

如果覺得太長也可以只翻一段就好 謝啦

3 Answers

Rating
  • jeff
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    說真的你的文法有錯誤,我連帶正確的原文跟翻譯給你;

    Thestudios clearly recognize the value of getting exposure for their movies onsuch a heavily trafficked Web sit.工作室清楚認出穿上他們的電影的底片這樣的一重買賣的Web sit的價值。 Marc Smugger, chairman of Universal

    Pictures, noted that his company's marketing team distributed promotional videoclips of all its new if Imps to Web sites such as You Tube.馬克Smugger, UniversalPictures的主席,注意到他公司銷售隊分發促進的錄像剪輯它的全部新if Imps在例如You Tube的網站。

    2009-04-18 21:34:56 補充:

    Of course, the studios could not expect users to voluntarily ignore illegal clips in favor of the approved ones, or even discern the difference between them.當然,工作室不能期望用戶有利於被批准的東西自願忽視不合法的夾子,或者甚至認出在他們之間的差別。

    2009-04-18 21:35:02 補充:

    So, it made sense for the

    movie industry 10 follow the lead of the music industry.

    因此,它為電影有意義第10 工業效法音樂工業。

    2009-04-18 21:35:22 補充:

    Where the focus shifted from killing off illegal uploads to taking advantage of digital music as a new source of revenue.

    這裡焦點移動從消減不合法的上載到利用數字音樂作為新財源。 What happens when the two sides can’t agree on terms? 當雙方不能同意條件時,發生什麼?

    2009-04-18 21:35:55 補充:

    In some cases, the studios have to tread lightly because of their diverse interests in the media.在一些情況,因為他們的完全不同的對媒介的興趣,工作室必須輕輕踩。 For example. 例如。

    2009-04-18 21:36:00 補充:

    News Corporation also owns My Space, which itself houses untold numbers of unauthorized music and video clips that are posted by users. 消息公司也擁有My Space,它自己房子被用戶委派的沒透露的許多未被授權的音樂和錄像剪輯。

    2009-04-18 21:36:23 補充:

    The delicate balance between vigilance and public relations surfaced in

    January 2007 when News Corporation filed a subpoena in a U.S. District Court to compel Goggle to turn over the identity of a user who uploaded episodes of the Fox Television programs 24 and The Slipslops to You Tube.

    2009-04-18 21:36:27 補充:

    當新聞公司陸續編入傳票時,在警惕和公共關係之間的精美的平衡裝以面in January 2007一美國 地方初審法院強迫Goggle移交把福克斯第24電視節目和Slipslops的插曲上載到You Tube的一個用戶的身分

    2009-04-18 21:36:57 補充:

    Fox was simply looking to protect its copyrights. 福克斯僅僅指望保護它的版權。 But the network risked angering fans of the shows, as well as fans of You Tube, if it pursued the individual too aggressively.但是網路冒激怒演出的球迷的危險,和You Tube的愛好者,如果它太積極追蹤個人。

    2009-04-18 21:37:07 補充:

    Moreover.而且。 News Corporation could come across as hypocritical for seeking to punish a You Tube user while so many of users of My Space were pinnate to engage in the sac behavior.

    消息公司能為想辦法處罰一個You Tube 用戶看上去似乎是偽善, 因此My Space的大多數用戶是從事sac行為的pinnate。

    2009-04-18 21:37:21 補充:

    1n early 2007, you Tube revealed its intention to explore a revenue-sharing model. 1 n早的2007,You Tube 顯示探索一個分享收入的模型的它的意圖。 By sharing revenue with content creators.透過與內容創造者分享收入。

    2009-04-18 21:37:32 補充:

    YouTube might be able to return the focus of the site to its original purpose, and Steer users away from the practice of uploading their favorite copyrighted material. YouTube能對它的原先的目的返回場所的焦點, 並且掌舵用戶離開上載他們的最喜歡的獲得版權的材料的實踐。

    2009-04-18 21:37:51 補充:

    Metacafe and Revver. Metacafe和Revver。 two other video-sharing sites.兩個其他分享錄像的場所。 Already had such models in place. 已經這樣的適當的模型。

    2009-04-18 21:38:26 補充:

    有一些專有名詞我並沒有翻譯 如果需要請寄信唷1辛苦了

    2009-04-19 07:52:10 補充:

    注意§在2009-04-18 21:37:21 補充再裡面有一個1n應該要改成in所以再翻譯裡面要翻成''在''

  • 1 decade ago

    演播室明顯的可以得到他們的電影曝光的價值在這樣一個沉重交易的網SITC

    Source(s): = = 真恐怖= =
  • 1 decade ago

    演播室明顯地卻可得到他們的電影的曝光的價值在這樣一個沉重被交易的網。 Marc Shmuger,普遍性的主席圖片,著名他的company' s营销隊分佈了所有它新的fI Ims增進录象剪辑到網站例如YouTube。 當然,演播室不能盼望用戶自願忽略非法夾子傾向於批准部分,甚至辯明他们之间的區別。 因此,它有的道理电影业10跟隨音乐界的带头。那里焦點從殺害轉移了非法加載到利用數字式音樂作为新的收支来源。什麼發生,当双方ean' t对期限达成协议? 由於他們在媒介的不同的興趣ln有些案件,演播室必須輕地踐踏。 為例子。 news Corporation也擁有MySpace,本身安置未批准的音樂和录象剪辑的無限的數字由用戶張貼。 在警惕性和公共关系之間的精美平衡浮出了水面 2007年1月,当News Corporation歸檔在美國地方法院的一張傳票強迫Google移交上載Fox的情節用戶时的身分 电视节目24和對YouTube的Simpsolls。 Fox看保護它的版權。 如果它太積極地,追求個體,但是網絡冒險激怒展示的迷,並且YouTube風扇。 而且。 当那么许多MySpace的用戶pennitted参与samc行為时, News Corporation可能遇到如偽善為了寻求能懲罰YouTube用戶。 1n早期2007年, YouTube顯露了它的意圖探索一個收支分享的模型。 通过分享收支與美滿的創作者。 YouTube也許能退回站點的焦点到它原始的目的,并且操縱遠離上載他們喜愛的受著作權保護的材料實踐的用戶。 Metacafe和Revver。 其他二個錄影分享的站點。 已經有到位这样模型。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.