Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Since the Constitution is defunct, should we change to a Viking Benevolent King System, like Norway & Denmark?

Would the money saved by not having elections Pay for Health care

Campaign funds ae now well over a Trillion Dollars for every job from Dog Catcher to POTUS

Update:

I see YAHOO is blocking this Question

They must think Americans shouldn't think about protecting and preserving the Constitution

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    yeah why not as we dont have a benevolent bastard in all of washington dc

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The Constitution is only defunct if we allow it to be. That is why we need to stand up and unite as a people again against a "too large" government.

  • Exile
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    No, we should fight to protect the Constitution. We have the most successful country on the planet and our Constitution restricted our government while other countries restrict the rights of their people.

    The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. --Edmund Burke

  • 1 decade ago

    King Obama does have a nice ring to it, that would solve that whole term limit problem we will face in 2016

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I favor the little house on the prairie system, mixed in with some tombstone action

  • 1 decade ago

    Danelaw wasn't too popular here in Britain.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.