Does this illustrate that Obama supporters either don't understand his economic plan or don't care?

Earlier I asked: How come Obama supporters always talk about "facts" but never provide any? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoojtISqKYnKdalaSIjOOrfsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090324165327AAoRwb2 I also gave an open invitation for ANYONE to explain how Obama's economic plan would work AND... show more Earlier I asked:

How come Obama supporters always talk about "facts" but never provide any?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoojtISqKYnKdalaSIjOOrfsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090324165327AAoRwb2

I also gave an open invitation for ANYONE to explain how Obama's economic plan would work AND succeed.

So a grand total of TWO people actually posted an argument in defense of Obama's economic plan.

The first was this (notice how he talks about "some" inflation...lol):
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArS4_JNT6QdrNPd7J.xPNg_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090324163929AALnYV9

The 2nd provided a link to another question that said "The 3 countries with the highest standard of living in the world all have socialist policies. Norway, Sweden, Canada."

While a third claimed he had facts but that the ignorant right wing just ignored them, so he stopped trying. He referenced the first guy's post as proof of how "facts" don't work.

The rest of Obama supporters simply ignored the question by calling it a straw man or didn't answer and gave thumbs up to the people mentioned above.

So what do you make of this??
Update: g........I didn't think it was magic, but apparently so. Please email me this "long" explanation if you would be so kind .
Update 2: michael n........"All we can do is look at history, and make a projection based on the best information we have."

Well at least we agree on that. Perhaps we're reading two different history books ;)
Update 3: smarty kat.....but then one could assume you never had facts to begin with.....
Update 4: michael n......I'll send you an email over the next few days.
Update 5: pesky.....that was thoroughly uninformative.
Update 6: g.......that's what I thought :)
Update 7: g.........I actually did look thru quite of few of your questions....lol You're just as clueless as the rest. You just word it better :) I've also realized your irrational hatred of "cons" (the use of the phrase says VOLUMES) probably stems from the fact that you live in South Carolina.... show more g.........I actually did look thru quite of few of your questions....lol

You're just as clueless as the rest. You just word it better :)

I've also realized your irrational hatred of "cons" (the use of the phrase says VOLUMES) probably stems from the fact that you live in South Carolina. Suggestion: don't project YOUR state onto EVERY other state.

There is a DIFFERENCE between social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, you conveniently lump the two together.
29 answers 29