英文 文章 改錯 高手請幫忙 20點

TOPIC: should we test medicines on animals?

There are a variety of different perspectives about whether or not we should use animals on medical testing. Numerous people hold a perception that testing on animals should be banned. Nevertheless, others are convinced that it is imperative to test medicines on animals which would avoid harming human bodies. In this issue, I will discuss these arguments for and against testing on animals as follows.

Arguing in favor, firstly, medical testing on animals ensure a safety and efficiency of medicines which is going to be used on human bodies. According to a recent report, there are approximately 5 million people each year around the world who benefit from animal testing to use safe medicines. Secondly, animal testing would improve the development of medical science and research. For instance, scientists can develop new medical technology through experiments on animals which is vitally important to human beings. As a result, animal testing is essential to a modern society.

Arguing against, nonetheless, it is a mistake to discount the negative dimension of animal testing. Undoubtedly, suffering of billions of animals is one of key reasons for anti-testing. When a medicine is potentially harmful, animals in the medical experiment would suffer considerable distress to die. Furthermore, animal testing is not the only option for medical science. For example, computer science and simulation technology can provide alternatives for medical testing. Consequently, animal testing activities should be banished.

In conclusion, from my perspective, it is crucial to ensure that medical testing on animals cause the minimum suffering and distress. However, owing to the safety of all human beings, I feel strongly that animal testing is indispensable, and that human beings will continue to benefit form it in the future.

請指出文法 語意 慣用法之類的錯誤 謝謝~

3 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    should we test medicines on animals?

    =(Should) (We) (Test) (Medicines) on (Animals)?

    ensure a safety and efficiency of medicines which is going to be used on human bodies.

    =ensure (the) safety and efficiency of medicines which (are) going to be used on human bodies.

    technology through experiments on animals which is vitally important to human beings.

    =technology through (the) experiments on animals which are (very) important to human beings.(vital important 選一個用)

    As a result, animal testing is essential to a modern society.

    =As a result, animal testing is essential to (拿掉) modern society.

    Undoubtedly, suffering of billions of animals is one of key reasons for anti-testing.

    =Undoubtedly, (the) suffering of billions of animals is (the) key (to) (anti-testings).

    I feel strongly that animal testing is indispensable, and that human beings will continue to benefit form it in the future.

    =I (strongly) (think) that (the) animal testing is (so) indispensable that human beings will continue to benefit form it in the future.

    以上答案給你參考看看

    2009-03-20 17:33:21 補充:

    最後一句我改一下

    =I (strongly) (think) that (the) animal testing(s) (are) (so) indispensable that human beings will continue to benefit form it in the future.

    因為你不會只做一種動物實驗,the再看看你有沒有限定哪幾種實驗

  • 1 decade ago

    TOPIC: should we test medicine(沒有s) on animals?

    There are a variety of different perspectives about whether or not we should use animals on medical testing. Numerous people hold a perception that testing on animals should be banned. Nevertheless, others are convinced that it is imperative to test medicine on animals BECAUSE IT would avoid harming human bodies. In this issue, I will discuss these arguments for and against testing on animals as follows.

    Arguing in favor, first(沒有+LY這種東東), medical testing on animals ensure a safety and efficiency of medicine which is going to be used on human. According to a recent report, approximately 5 million people each year around the world TAKE ADVANTAGE OF animal testing to use safe medicines. Secondly, animal testing would improve the development of medical science and research. For instance, scientists can develop new medical technology through experiments on animals which is vitally important to human beings. As a result, animal testing is essential to modern society.

    Arguing against, nonetheless, it is a mistake to discount the negative dimension of animal testing. Undoubtedly, suffering of billions of animals is one of MAIN reasons for anti-testing. When a medicine is potentially harmful, animals in the medical experiment would suffer considerable distress to die. Furthermore, animal testing is not the only option for medical science. For example, computer science and simulation technology can provide alternatives for medical testing. Consequently, animal testing activities should be banished.

    In conclusion, from my perspective, it is crucial to ensure that medical testing on animals cause the minimum suffering and distress. However, owing to the safety of all human beings, I feel strongly that animal testing is indispensable, and that human beings will continue to benefit FROM it in the future.

    Source(s): ME
  • 1 decade ago

    TOPIC: Should We Test Medicines on Animals?

    There are a variety of different perspectives about whether or not we should use animals on medical testing. Numerous people hold a perception that testing on animals should be banned. Nevertheless, others are convinced that it is imperative to test medicines on animals which would avoid harming human bodies. In this issue, I will discuss these arguments for and against testing on animals as follows.

    Arguing in favor, firstly, medical testing on animals ensure(需加s) a safety and efficiency of medicines which is going to be used on human bodies. According to a recent report, there are approximately 5 million people each year around the world who benefit from animal testing to use safe medicines. Secondly, animal testing would improve the development of medical science and research. For instance, scientists can develop new medical technology through experiments on animals which is vitally important to human beings. As a result, animal testing is essential to a modern society.

    Arguing against, nonetheless, it is a mistake to discount the negative dimension of animal testing. Undoubtedly, suffering of billions of animals is one of key reasons for anti-testing. When a medicine is potentially harmful, animals in the medical experiment would suffer considerable distress to die. Furthermore, animal testing is not the only option for medical science. For example, computer science and simulation technology can provide alternatives for medical testing. Consequently, animal testing activities should be banished.

    In conclusion, from my perspective, it is crucial to ensure that medical testing on animals cause the minimum suffering and distress. However, owing to the safety of all human beings, I feel strongly that animal testing is indispensable, and that human beings will continue to benefit form it in the future.

    我覺得只有標題和一個地方

    Source(s): me
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.