Did you know about the update to this bill which will take away right to bear small arms via United Nations?

You can philosophize all you want, we are in the middle of an economic and political meltdown and the enemy is no longer at the gate; he is in the hen house and many of us instinctively know that we are screwed. 2010 cannot come fast enough and I am not sure if by that time, it may be too late. You will see what I am talking about once you read on.

I just received an update of a bill that has supposedly already passed the House and is on it's way to the Senate. I know I am pretty up on all the shennanigins going on but this oine definitely got past me. Just look at what else that THUG has in store for us.

Those Republicans who argued that Obama didn't sponsor any substantive legislation during his term as a Senator obviously didn't get a chance to see this. And it is a hoot!!!!

This Senate Bill 2433 is a piece of legislation in the works that all Americans need to know about now!


This Bill, sponsored by none other than our "President", former Sen. Barrack Obama, with the backing of now V/P Joe Biden on the Foreign Relations Committee, and liberal democrats in Congress, is nothing short of a massive giveaway of American wealth around the world, and a betrayal of the public trust, because, if passed, this bill would give over many aspects of our sovereignty to the United Nations.

The noble sounding name of this bill, "The

Global Poverty Act" is actually a Global Tax, payable to the United

Nations, that will be required of all American taxpayers. If passed

in the Senate,( the House has already passed it,) this bill would

require the U.S. to increase our foreign aid by $65 BILLION per year, or $845 BILLION over the next 13 years! That's on top of the billions of

dollars in foreign aid that we already pay out!

In addition to the economic burdens this potential law would place on our precarious economy, the bill, if passed in the Senate, would also endanger our constitutionally protected rights and freedoms by obligating us to meet certain United Nations mandates.

According to Senator Obama, we should establish these United Nations' goals as benchmarks for U. S. spending. What are they?

The creation of a U.N. International Criminal Court having power to try and convict American citizens and soldiers without any protection from the U.S. Constitution.

A standing United Nations Army forcing U.S. soldiers to serve under U.N. command.

Gun Ban on all small arms and light weapons

which would repeal our Second Amendment right to bear arms.

The ratification of the "Kyoto" global warming

treaty and numerous other anti-American measures.

Recently, the Senate Subcommittee on

Foreign Relations (where Sen. Joe Biden was) approved this plan by a

voice vote without any discussion!

Why all the secrecy? If Senators Obama

and Biden are so proud of this legislation, then why don't they bring it

out into the light of day and let the American people have a look at it

instead of hiding it behind closed doors and sneaking it through

Congress for late night votes? It may be only a matter of time before this

dangerous legislation reaches a floor vote in the full body of the


SENATE BILL 2433. (www.loc.gov)

I am passing this one on. The comments are not mine but this needs to be addressed NOW because the ramifications are so great. Does anyone have the ear of the RNC? I have not heard a peep out of Michael Steele or any other Repubic since Holder made those racist remarks. I may be wrong but I am starting to get a sinking feeling that the cavalry is not on it's way. Please tell me I am wrong Mr. Dunn.


this bill allows the United Nations to overrule local/government rule. So much for states rights...

Update 2:

shuttterbug: YES, I have read this bill...both versions.... and I stand by what I wrote... I don't fold by being called a right winger.... to me, that's a compliment...

9 Answers

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    while the part about the small arms ban infuriates me, as a freshly enlisted infantryman, i'd much rather fight under UN command. obama doesn't know what he's doing when it comes to being Commander in chief.

  • 1 decade ago

    Welcome to the New World Order!

    This has been underway for decades now, but is now in high gear (I assume because what they have gotten away with already, and that they believe this NWO agenda is unstoppable at this point.

    I am not so sure we the people could stop it either.

    The New World Order movement is the agenda of the private owners of the Federal Reserve, and a small handful of other elite families. In 1921 the Federal Reserve created the CFR(Council on Foreign Relations). The entire, and complete purpose of the CFR is to enact the New World Order. Today over 90% of the US State Department, as well as the Executive Branch(Obama included) are CFR members! See where this is going?

    Most of the meaning of the Second Amendment is the right for the people to bear arms in the interest of keeping our government in check. We've neglected our duty concerning this to the point that government has outgrown us, and has been completely infiltrated, and infected with an anti American agenda. It's sad that freedom does not come free, and those who take it for granted will see it replaced with Fascism.

    I have heard several ideas lately the Dems have to restricting guns.

    One is that they will not attack gun ownership directly, but that they will require a million dollar insurance policy per gun, and a gun ownership liscense. Fail to pay your insurance, and you become an instant felon!

    Another thing I have heard is the idea of taxing ammunition beyond the point of reality.

    I know many people who say they won't give up their gun(s), and I really hope they mean what they say, because if we surrendered our guns today, America would be dead before morning at the hands of this Socialist government!

  • GunnyC
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    That bill has died but HR45 is still in committee. The UN summitt and list of demands/wish list of what they wanted sort of went silent after problems with many portions of it but did arise a little when the question of sending money to support the poorer countries came up. What President Obama will do or will try to do is still up in the air. Still waiting for the shoe to drop on his civilian national security force he sees as necessary, the $900 million he just promised to the Gaza Palestinians today to help rebuild, and how deep he plans to gut the military (already has been told that the budget request must be reduced 10% so what else is cut in a question). Holder did not make any racist statements he is a Democrat so he could not be a racist.

  • 1 decade ago


    Have you actually READ the text of the bill? If you read the text of the bill, it says not one word about giving up US sovereignty to the international criminal court, a UN army, or a gun ban.

    What's more, even the part about the cost of the bill is a complete fabrication. The bill includes no appropriations, and only requests the president to come up with a plan to address the international poverty issues which the bill raises. The bill is entirely without cost as it is written, and obligates us to not one single cent of spending, though what it proposes would certainly eventually have a pretty hefty cost. The figures included in this appear to be just made up on the spot.

    This is simply more ring wing fear mongering, and anyone with a brain would do some actual research before posting this on something like YA.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes, I knew about it. You can yell up and down and still people don't seem to hear the facts that Obama is wanting to enslave the US and have the UN control EVERYTHING. I heard about how they are wanting to increase the taxes, but you can only do so much to get people to LISTEN to how evil these people who are there.

    I personally think that the people who had the blessing of the CFR and supersnobs (I refuse to call the elite anything) to become "president" did so with the intention that their nationality was in question for a reason. That is probably their ace in the hole that they wanted so they can push this BS forward even faster.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The UN, PETA and PAT ROBERTSON. All pathetic jokes.

    The UN is as useful as a thong on a nun!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    um, i call right wing BS. people are always making up conspiracy theorys about the government wanting to take away your rights. it used to be the liberals but since republicans are butt hurt over their more-senile-version-of-bush-candidate losing it seems to be them making things up now.

    have you READ any of the news about obamas goals? he wants to cut our deficit in half by 2012, you dont do that by giving money to the UN.

    and selling out americans to international courts? that will never happen. not unless that american was a criminal that did something in another country.

    and a country wide gun ban? sorry that wont happen either. there's too many gun associations that have pull with government officials, and its too big a part of our history.

    unlike this guy, atlesat the crackpots who rambled on about the second gunman, area 51, and "microchips implanted in their brains so the government can track them" were entertaining.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Because the UN is our new one world government. I knew BO was pushing this while he was campaigning.

  • Mike W
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    I'm not sure I can buy into this. There is a mistaken belief that the Second Amendment grants us the right to bear arms. It does not. It only reaffirms that right and states that the government cannot infringe upon that right.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.