winjen asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

請幫我看看!!一個英翻中的急件!!

The differences between the previous evaluation and relevant literature were attributed to different assumptions on occupation rate, proportion of infectious industrial waste, and improper classification of medical waste by the local medical staff. Additionally, after the SARS outbreak in Taiwan, medical units were overly cautious and treated all waste as medical waste to eliminate environmental pollution and public health risks.

Since the evaluated production revealed a total generation rate, more details about the waste classification and quantity were needed. As a result, the EPA began to work on the manifest system (relevant specifications of the manifest are described in Section 3.4 in this paper) in 1997. Since August 1998, medical units with 50 beds were requested to declare the amount of waste produced according to relevant specifications via the internet. They were joined by medical organizations licensed for 50 beds or greater, since July 2002 as well as hospitals, hemodialysis centers, and clinics with three medical departments or greater, since April 2005. Other small clinics were requested to declare their production of infectious industrial waste treatment in a six-copy manifest.

This study analyzed the classification and production of infectious industrial waste based on declarations in 2003–2005 obtained by the EPA Industrial Waste Control Center Reporting System, focusing on hospitals, hemodialysis centers, and clinics with three or more medical departments.

Total declared waste generated by the medical units was roughly 80,000–92,000 tons/yr. This waste could be classified into six different categories: C-05 (flammable) infectious industrial waste; C-06 (inflammable) infectious industrial waste; C, other hazardous industrial waste; D, general industrial waste; E, compound metal waste; and R, recyclable waste. Table 3 and Fig. 1 present summaries of data obtained by the EPA Industrial Waste Control Center Reporting System for 2003–2005.

2 Answers

Rating
  • 小真
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    之間的差異前的評價和有關文獻是由於不同的假設的佔用率,傳染病的比例工業廢水,並分類不當醫療廢物由當地醫療人員。此外,在SARS疫情在台灣,醫療單位過於謹慎,所有廢物處理,醫療廢物,消除環境污染和公眾的健康風險。

    由於生產評價顯示,總發電率,更詳細的廢物分類和數量的需要。因此,美國環保局開始工作的艙單系統(相關規格的清單中所描述第3.4節本文)於1997年。自1998年8月,醫療單位有50個床位被要求申報產生的廢物量,要依照有關規定通過互聯網。他們也加入了醫療機構許可證50張床位或更大, 2002年7月以來,以及醫院,血液中心和診所有三個醫療部門或更大,自2005年4月。其他小診所被要求申報其生產的傳染病工業廢物處理了6個拷貝明顯。

    這項研究分析了分類和生產的傳染病工業廢物申報的基礎上在2003-2005年獲得了美國環保局工業廢水控制中心匯報制度,把重點放在醫院,血液中心和診所有三個或三個以上的醫療部門。

    共計申報廢棄物所產生的醫療單位大約是80000-92000噸/年。這些廢物可分為六個不同的類別:架C - 05 (易燃)傳染病工業廢料;架C - 06 (易燃)傳染病工業廢料; ,其他有害工業廢物的;天,一般工業廢物;英,複合金屬廢料;和俄,循環再造的廢物。表3和圖。一本總結獲得的數據由環保局工業廢水控制中心報告系統2003-2005年。

    圖片參考:http://tw.yimg.com/i/tw/ugc/rte/smiley_39.gif

    Source(s): me
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    版大您好:

    在早先評估和相關的文學之间的区别歸因於在職業感染工业废料的率、比例和醫療廢物的不正當的分類的不同的假定由地方醫療職員。 另外,在SARS爆發以後在臺灣,醫療單位结束謹慎的并且對待所有廢物作为醫療廢物消滅环境污染和公共卫生風險。

    因为被評估的生產顯露了總世代率,關於廢分類和數量的更多細節是需要的。 結果, EPA在1997年開始研究明顯系統(相關的規格明顯被描述在本文的第3.4部分)。 從1998年8月,與50張床的醫療單位請求宣稱根據相關的規格廢物导致的相当数量通过互聯網。 他們由醫療组织加入准許為50張床或偉大,從2002年7月並且醫院、血液透析與三医务部的中心和診所或偉大,從2005年4月。 其他小診所請求宣稱他們的感染工业废料治疗的生產在明顯的六拷貝的

    這項研究分析了根据在EPA工业废料控制中心报告制度獲得的2003-2005的聲明的感染工业废料的分類和生產,集中于醫院、血液透析與三個或多個医务部的中心和診所。

    共計宣稱醫療單位引起的廢物是大致80,000-92,000 tons/yr。 這廢物能被分類入六個不同類別: C-05 (易燃的)感染工业废料; C-06 (易燃的)感染工业废料; C,其他危害工业废料; D,一般工业废料; E,複合金屬廢物; 并且R,可再循環的廢物。 表3和图1 EPA工业废料控制中心报告制度得到的當前總結數據在2003-2005。

    Source(s): yahoo!迷你筆
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.