關於Cost-effectiveness 的一些翻譯

Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-need-to-treat:common sense or non-sense?

we argue that NNT may be a straightforward measure of benefit when the effect of an intervention is immediate,but that serious problem arise when the effect is delay rather than avoidance of an adverse event

A simple alternative is to estimate the cost per adverse event avoided

by means of the number-needed-to-treat(NNT)-'the poor man's cost-effectiveness analysis

因為我翻譯出來的感覺怪怪的

希望高手能幫我一下

謝謝!

1 Answer

Rating
  • devin
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-need-to-treat:common sense or non-sense?

    譯:成本有效之分析以多少病人必須作治療為基礎:有共同認識或無知(胡說)

    we argue that NNT may be a straightforward measure of benefit when the effect of an intervention is immediate,but that serious problem arise when the effect is delay rather than avoidance of an adverse event

    譯:我們爭論的是NNT(多少病人需要治療)與其在(醫療)介入之效應是立即時,寧可是一種明確肯定的有益評估工具,但是當效應延遲導致嚴重問題產生時,也不願避免一不利事情之發生

    A simple alternative is to estimate the cost per adverse event avoided

    by means of the number-needed-to-treat(NNT)-'the poor man's cost-effectiveness analysis

    譯:一簡單(二擇一)選擇是藉由多少病人必須治療(NTT)的方法去估算每一不利事件避開之成本---窮人的成本有效分析

    註:rather than 與其...而不願,不要

    註:Number Needed to Treat (NNT)

    圖片參考:http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/images/1_trans.gif

    Definition

    The NNT is the number of patients who need to be treated in order to prevent one additional bad outcome. It is the inverse of the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).NTT是多少數目的病人必須接受治療以避免另一不良結果反應.NTT是絕對風險降低之倒數

    How to Calculate NNTs

    NNT = 1/ARR

    ARR = |CER - EER|

    where

    CER = control group event rate

    EER = experimental group event rate

    http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/glossary/nnts.htm

    The number needed to treat (NNT) is an epidemiological measure used in assessing the effectiveness of a health-care intervention, typically a treatment with medication. The NNT is the number of patients who need to be treated in order to prevent one additional bad outcome (i.e. to reduce the expected number of cases of a defined endpoint by one). It is defined as the inverse of the absolute risk reduction. It was described in 1988.[1]

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    以上提供,希望對貴方有幫助到

    2008-12-28 03:41:20 補充:

    與其在(醫療)介入之效應是立即時,寧可是一種明確肯定的有益評估工具

    略修改為偏向在(醫療)介入之效應是立即時,可能是一種明確肯定的有益評估工具

    Source(s): 自己鑽研及廣查資訊, 同上
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.