Anonymous
Anonymous asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 1 decade ago

What will Global Warming Fanatics do now that 650 scientists have now dissented from their retarded theory?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=...

"Global warming in the dustbin of history"

I could not have said it better....

(watch now as the AGW fanatics come and try to discredit or censor this information by attacking my source, or keep insisting that global warming is real regardless (without providing any hard evidence as usual) or keep pushing their retarded population control/carbon tax/carbon liscence nonsense)

Doesn't take away from the REAL scientists who know I'm right, just to name a few (out of the hundreds):

Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden

Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

And the AGW fanatics' sources:

Al Gore

Al Gore

Al Gore

Al Gore

Dana master of retards on Y!A

Al Gore

Al Gore

16 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    They are scrambling to produce concept patches that will restore the confidence of the sheep in their holy predictions of the future. As the solemn predictions of the doom and gloom movement fail the test of time more people start looking for truth instead of fiction and it is the skeptics as always that are the guardians of truth. For the faithful believers it is called panic and guilt drive sales. For a clear explanation in short form of how the whole thing functions see the link below.

    Neil Diamond and Johnny Cash Bother Loves traveling salvation show..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCgeWUKcumA

    Youtube thumbnail

    And for a longer and more detailed explanation of the way it is done I recommend the following.

    http://us.imdb.com/Reviews/105/10561

    To get the the most understanding you will need to watch the movie. The insight into how these things are managed is worth it as ist makes it much easier to spot them up front and not get victimized as the innocent victims of AGW have been.

  • 1 decade ago

    "And the AGW fanatics' sources:"

    Al Gore

    Al Gore

    Al Gore

    Al Gore

    Dana master of retards on Y!A

    Al Gore

    Al Gore

    In the 10 months I've been posting here 8 times out of 10 it seems to be deniers who want to drag up Gore it seems to almost be a fetish. It would seem easier to ignore the fact scientists had been researching this solidly for 30 years before gores documentary.

    And "AGW fanatics' sources" here are some, of course none of these are not the usual highly reliable personal blogs.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2008/...

    http://www.ucar.edu/learn/1_3_1.htm

    http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/pastcc.ht...

    http://www.csiro.gov.au/science/ps38v.html

    http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/guide/

    http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/

    And of course the myths that are put forward by many of the main deniers here, are either twisting of actual facts or in a number of cases twisting without any facts.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11462

    With repeated Qs & As on Mayan calendars, communist plots, U.N. plots, Al Gore plots really how do you think anyone takes you seriously.

    Update, this question was posted 2 days ago with a link to the so called 650 scientists with the promise that the senate report would be out in 24 hours, it is now 3 days since Mark Morano posted this nonsense still no sign of this (important?) report.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    the earth has gone through climate change before, and it will happen again after this is over.

    regardless, it wouldnt hurt to dump less trash, pollute less water, be less wasteful, save baby seals, and other such things relating to the environment. alternative fuel sources arent hurting anyone.

  • 1 decade ago

    My own sourcelist would start with:

    'World Scientists Warning to Humanity' (1992), signed by over half the surviving Nobel Laureates in the physical sciences.

    Also:

    http://www.geocities.com/nd_wtf/Paperpositions.txt

    http://www.geocities.com/nd_wtf/AGWlist.txt

    83 pro-human-caused global warming papers there. From a random selection taken from googlescholar, zero rejected human caused global warming.

    I would also reference any of the 40-60 organisations from here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    science: ur doin it rong

    Cobbling together lists of economists, medical doctors, and scientists who have at one point or another expressed some sort of agreement with your hypothesis does not constitute proof of that hypothesis. Leave the lists to the creationists, why don't let's?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's no longer Global Warming, since that pesky temperature thing quit rising. Now it's Global Climate Change. It used to be in the future it was going to get hotter, but now it's going to be hot and cold, all caused by humans.

    They'll find some other hysteria, for some people, the sky is always falling.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Whether Global Warming is real or not, theres nothing wrong with spending money to help clean and preserve health of this wonderful planet I call earth.

    Whatever to you planet hating losers, I love my planet and I would love not to see it a giant garbage dump in a 100 years. (which will probably end up happening because of careless dumbass's like you who dont give a crap)

  • 1 decade ago

    all i know is when Bush had a meeting on the subject he came out of the meeting looking like he had been Bich-slapped into Reality~!

    and he was as big a nay-sayer as you can get~!

    his statement was "its Real"~!!!!

    Source(s): me!
  • Do you realize that 650 scientists out of all scientists is not a large percentage?

  • 1 decade ago

    Frankly they won't change a thing. If you have noticed, it's not Global Warming anymore...its Global Climate Change.

    Honestly, if the climate did not change then I would get worried.

    This is the religion of the left...I just wonder how they will handle the next couple of decades when winter is a cold mother!

    Be well

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.