林下巴 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

我需要非常流暢通順的翻譯20點

哈摟急用感謝啦~

這些是一些美國法律的玩意兒

Most jurisdictions do not allow "self-help" to remove trespassers. The usual procedure is to ask the trespassing person to leave, then to call law enforcement officials if they do not. As long as the trespasser is not posing an immediate threat, they cannot be removed by force. It is usually illegal to arrest a trespasser and hold them on the property until law enforcement arrives as this defeats the purpose of allowing them to cure the trespass by leaving. A large exception to this rule are railroads in the United States and Canada, who employ their own police forces to enforce state or provincial trespassing laws. Railroad police have the ability to independently arrest and prosecute trespassers without the approval or assistance of local law enforcement. Further, in many jurisdictions, trespassing on railroad tracks is considered a very severe offense comparable to drunk driving, with severe fines imposed on the tresspassers. Some jurisdictions even going so far as to impose fines higher than that of a drunk driving or marijuana possession conviction.

1 Answer

Rating
  • 壽司
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    大部分司法管轄區不允許“自助”刪除入侵者。通常的程序是請人非法離開,然後要求執法官員如果他們不。只要侵入者是沒有構成直接的威脅,他們不能被刪除的力量。它通常是非法的逮捕一名侵入者,並追究他們的財產,直至到達執法本隊的目的,使他們能夠治愈的侵入留下。大型例外,這一規則是鐵路在美國和加拿大,誰僱用他們自己的警察部隊執行國家或省級侵入的法律。鐵路警察有能力獨立逮捕和加拿大,誰僱用他們自己的警察部隊執行國家或省級侵入的法律。鐵路警察有能力獨立逮捕和起訴入侵者未經批准或協助當地執法。此外,在許多國家,擅自在鐵軌被認為是一個非常嚴重的進攻相比,酒後駕駛,嚴重罰款的tresspassers 。某些司法管轄區,甚至實行罰款高於一個酒後駕車或私藏大麻的信念。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.