Should the United States mind it's own business?
Suppose the United States just closed down for renovations. Suppose we brought all the troops home to protect the US borders instead of Iraq. Supposed we cut off all foreign aid and started aiding Americans. Supposed we closed down the country and did not allow any foreign trade for 5 years. All goods would have to be bought and sold in the US. Suppose we did not grant any new citizenships for 5 years and focused who is eligible to stay and who needs to leave then followed up and sent them home. What do you think the repercussions would be?
This has nothing to do with who I'm voting for or you vote for. Take a break from that, please. Also, we have enough oil on reserv to last more than 20 years so the economy would not collapse. Think again. It may simple, but I'm not convinced it won't work. Help me out.
- GreshnabLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
since we can only provide less than 30 percent of our oil.. our transportation network would crash.. blackouts riots.. starvation as food transport stopped...
pretty much all bad.
also we import more goods then we export so even if we import oil.. we would still go bankrupt
- bayeLv 43 years ago
the U. S. takes an suggestions-set of being a peace-maker for quite some the worldwide. it fairly is predicated in part on the non secular ideals that we are to a pair extent all responsible for another. it is likewise based on the notice that quite some something of the worldwide does not provide a rattling and that somebody ought to merchandise to what's in any different case mindless killing. The arguments appropriate to the U. S. wanting conflict journey to attempt its new weapons (toys?) is likewise regrettably actual and the worries of the various monopolistic manufacturers of palms have a level of pull into the quantity of the U. S. dedication. This undertaking is perplexed and complicated by using the actual incontrovertible fact that there is plenty wanting interest and correction at homestead, however the huge photograph ought to unavoidably be a complicated one and the two varieties of rectifications ought to ensue alongside with a heavily labored out stability between the tax-payers accumulated sums being spent on each and every. conflict being so costly in comparison to useful sociology, the former constantly takes priority and it fairly is national coverage desperate and maintained by using our leaders.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Suppose the government would give the taxpayers that bailout money instead of the companies. EVERY adult 18 years old and over would receive over $450,000.00. After taxes that would still be over $250,000.00. The government would get half of the bailout money back immediately, the economy would have a major boost. But this would be too easy. They don't think of how to make it easier on us as citizens. They just want more government.
- ShanahanLv 41 decade ago
Global economy collapases, great depression ensues that would be much deeper than any other ever seen. Not good.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- dlkLv 71 decade ago
Then I hope you voted against Obama since he strongly believes in sending our tax dollars overseas to help any and all who need it.
- ?Lv 51 decade ago
Isolationism - not going to happen - it would be devastating.Source(s): Michael there are almost 200 million people in the United States over the age 18. 450,000 * 200,000,000=90,000,000,000,000 or 90 trillion dollars