luke c asked in Social SciencePsychology · 1 decade ago

What are your thoughts on 9/11?

I think that it was planned by the U.S Government because NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) was running practice hijackings on the day of 9/11 so that there were a total of 26 hijackings only 4 of them were real and not practice. when the planes hit tower 6 and 7 NORAD did not call off there hijackings for another 20 minuets and they did not scramble jets for and hour and twenty minutes.

their was also a conspiracy that the planes were on auto-pilot Jim Hoffman and the Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice are among those who have said the Flight Management Computer Systems on board Flights 11, 175 and 77 could have been loaded with a preset route that guided the planes to their targets.[93] Boeing's technical specifications confirm that this is possible.[94] Hoffman suggests that Flight 77 performed the unusual spiral dive it made on its approach to the Pentagon with the help of the onboard computer.[95]

Some theories suggest that, rather than having preset routes entered into the planes' on-board computers, the planes were flown by remote control. The controllers of the planes may have been on the ground or, as in the "doomsday plane" theory, in another aircraft. This theory argues that a blurry white object seen in the sky in videos of the World Trade Center, was a plane containing the remote controller of Flights 11 and 175, and that an aircraft that flew away from The Pentagon after that impact contained the remote controller of Flight 77.[96] The aircraft at the Pentagon was later identified as a E-4B National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC) plane, a militarised version of a Boeing 747-200, taking part in the Global Guardian exercise.

Remote control of Boeing aircraft is only possible with the installation of additional software and even then the pilots can override control by moving the yoke.[97] Theories of remotely controlled aircraft have been criticised for ignoring phone calls made by passengers which state that their aircraft had been hijacked.[98]

The final piece that makes me belive in this is there were many small explosions seconds before the first plane hit those were bombs in the basement and also the cut core colliums, how could two tin 747's bring down two giant steel structers when steel melts at about 3000 degrees and jet fuel burns at 1200 degrees so what do you think now??

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Members of the Bush Administration (The Neocons) not only knew we were going to get attacked, on September 11, 2001; not only allowed it to happen; but were the driving force in organizing and providing financial backing for the attack. It's about controlling the Middle East's oil and selling more weapons, while impoverishing America. It wouldn't be the first time a country has gone into financial ruins trying to fund an unjust war.

    You seem like a person who really wants to know the truth and can handle the details necessary to get the job done. It is complex, but their is plenty of incriminating evidence available for those who can muster the stomach and courage to look at it. The following is a summary of some Internet research I conducted a few years ago. The who and the whys are just as incredible to research, but first you must get past WHAT REALLY HAPPENED on 9/11.

    _____________________________...

    WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS

    The World Trade Center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition after being attacked by aircraft. The only evidence our government provided that Osama confessed to the crime is fake. Most every video, taken of the towers, show explosive squibs just before the towers imploded. Traces of the explosive "Thermate" was also found at ground zero. Need proof of this, see the evidence at:

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhFJ1...

    PENTAGON

    There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head", found at the crash site, have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine; supporting the witnesses claim. This engine does not fit the commercial Boeing 757 that is said to have hit the Pentagon.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnSrg...

    FLIGHT 93

    United Airlines Flight 93 did not crash as a result of a struggle between the passengers and the alleged hijackers, but in fact was shot down by the North Dakota Air Guards flying F-16's. On orders from Adjutant General Mike Haugen of the State of North Dakota and in opposition to V.P. Cheney's stand down orders, Major Rick Gibney spotted the airline flying by remote control, headed toward Washington D.C. and shot it down. This is why debris, including human remains, rained on areas several miles away from the Shanksville, PA crash site.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhKmC...

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Miriam
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Whats 9/11? 9/11 is a american terminology for the even of the twin towers. But as I live In Britain We do not say 9/11 but rather 11/9 As for whom did it Ask your government

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    I was unaware that 747's were made of tin. Of course, no 747s were hijacked on 9/11, nor did ANY planes hit towers 6 or 7. But tin... those things must be pretty flimsy.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    No dude it was pissed of Muslims. To start, it couldn't have been computer presets. Since computers don't take into account the building's that are in the way of their descent into the towers/pentagon.

    Secondly, remote control would have to be installed by the company that the planes were under, not by the government. Trust me, they get checked and checked frequently.

    There were no explosion's when the tower's came down. That was a drastic misquote from a chief of NYC police. He said: "it sounded like explosion's when it came down." And beside, the magnitude of explosion's would be far greater than what was shown on video. Especially to bring down the towers.

    Steel does melt at a higher temp than jet fuel. But your not taking into account the fact the steel was damaged on the initial plane explosion. Not to mention the fires weren't just jet fuel. By the time the towers came down the fire spread to the floors above and below where the jet crashed and thus adding to the temp of just jet fuel.

    The history channel did a fact of fiction of the 9/11 conspiracies. I suggest you watch it since they took the time to get expert analysis rather than some made up crap and accepting it as fact.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It was a way of getting into Afghanistan after The taliban destroyed all their (mega financiers) opium fields 2 days prior. Now that we are in there Afghanistan is now the largest producer in the world. Opium keeps our economy going.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Even though the government lies to us, I do not think that our OWN government would plan to KILL MILLIONS of people, just so that they can invade Afghanistan. Gosh, you're stupid.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.