韓恩 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

急~~~有沒有英文很好的人可以幫我翻譯這段英文?

In addition to rating the physical attractiveness level of the dating partners,the observers recorded whether the couple engaged in intimate touching (such as holding hands,walking arm-in-arm,etc.) during the period of observation.Silverman hypothesized that couples more similar in attractiveness would seen to be happier with each other as reflected by their degree of physical intimacy.the data revealed that 60% of the couples who were highly similar in physical attractiveeness level were engagaged in intimate physical contact of some kind, as compared to 46% of the moderately similar couples and 22% of those in the lowest similarity group.

Silverman's evidence of fait accompli matching along the physical attractiveness dimension is not as unequivocal as one would like.Despite the fact that obaervers did not know how the other obaervers rated the attractiveness of the other member of the dating dating pair,they did,of course,see the dating partners.Thus,it is possible that a "halo" emanating from one dating partner and influencing perception of the other may have produced artifactually similar ratings of dating pairs.This possibility seems especially cogent,since Sigall and Landy(in press) have recently demonstrated that the favorability of the overall impression a mem makes on ourside observers is affected by the physical attractiveness level of a womem with whom he is romantically associated.Although knowledge of romantic association did not specifically appear to affact the rating of the man's physical attractiveness level,the pervasiveness of its effect along a number of other dimensions suggests that the fait accompli matching hypothesis might be best tested under conditions in which attractiveness judges are not aware of who is paired with whom.

Update:

這是一篇有關心理學的英文

2 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    在加法到對約會的夥伴估計的物理好看水平,觀察員記錄夫婦是否參與了親密接觸(例如藏品手、走的胳膊在胳膊等等)在觀察的期間。Silverman假設夫婦相似在好看會看見是愉快互相如由他們的程度物理 intimacy.the數據反射顯露了是高度相似的在物理attractiveeness水平是engagaged在某一種類親密的體接觸,與46%適度地相似的夫婦和22%那些比較在最低的相似性小組的那60%夫婦。

    配比沿物理好看維度的既成事實的 Silverman的證據不是一樣毫不含糊的,像你將想要。儘管事實obaervers不知道怎麼其他obaervers對約會的約會的對的另一名成員的好看估計,他們,路線,看見了約會的夥伴。因此,它是可能的」發出從一個約會的夥伴和影響其他的悟性的「光暈也許導致了artifactually約會對相似的規定值。這種可能性似乎特別有說服力,因為Sigall和Landy (在新聞中)最近顯示出, mem在ourside觀察員留下整體印象的 favorability是受的影響的 他是浪漫伴生的 womem的物理好看水平。雖然浪漫協會知識沒具體地出現對affact人的物理好看水平的規定值,它的作用的瀰漫沿一定數量的其他維度建議既成事實配比的假設也許在好看法官不知道的情況下最好檢驗誰配對與誰。

    希望對你有幫助

    Source(s): 你的內容
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    第一篇是用翻譯機翻的嗎?超爆笑

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.