Would you like the idea of having only 1 world champion in the WWE instead of 3?

Answer 1

Favorite Answer

Absolutely.

WWE should once again unify the WWE and WHC titles again.

As for the ECW title,the WWE should just drop that title all together.

The 2 tag team titles and the 2 female titles should also be unified.

The only titles they should have are:

The Unified Title

The Intercontinental Title

The U.S. Title

The Unified Women's Title

The Cruiserweight Title

The Unified Tag Team Title

Answer 2

We'd Only See The Same Flock Of Contenders

and Only 1 title Match at PPV's I Say We Best With 3

Answer 3

If that happened then there would be 2 or 3 world champions per year, for that single world title.

Answer 4

Yes, I would love it just like the old days when there was the undisputed champion and he was defending the title on all shows and I want them to combine raw smackdown and ecw so all the superstars are on the same show.

Answer 5

Not really.

If you do that then it would diminish the prestige on the other championship belt.

I don't consider the ECW belt to be world title since it is a midcard belt.

Answer 6

Yes because the value of a championship would mean more once somebody won the title.

Source(s): Say Hello To The Bad Guy

Answer 7

naw, 3 is more entertaining to me, i like to see alot of competition rather than one.

Answer 8

I AM 100% AGREE WITH YOU

Answer 9

It would be less chaotic...

Answer 10

no that would suck