what amendment gave the residents or people living in district of columbia the right to vote.?
also when did these residents receive the right ot vote
- Tmess2Lv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
The District of Columbia received electoral votes in the Presidential Election as a result of the twenty-third Amendment.
As to voting rights, that is a harder question. Several Amendments (15th, 20th, 24th, and 26th) forbid certain types of discrimination (age, race, gender, poll tax) in voting.
However, no part of the Constitution actually requires that elections be held in the District of Columbia. Under the Constitution, D.C., as the district of government, is (like the territories) subject to the direct control of Congress. Congress has, for the most part, allowed D.C. and the territories some degree of "home rule." However, if next week, Congress decided to abolish the D.C. government and replace it with a mayor appointed by the President, it could.
Even the Twenty-third Amendment only provides that electors shall be appointed in the manner established by Congress. If Congress dictated that the electors were to be chosen in a random fashion, that would be permitted by the Constitution.
In other words, to the extent that Congress authorizes D.C. to have elections, the residents of D.C. have voting rights as a result of the Amendments listed above. However, if Congress decided not to have elections in D.C., nothing in the Constitution would allow the residents of D.C. to complain that their voting rights were being violated.
- nahasLv 44 years ago
The dems in no way have been given rid of it. and for people who declare to be innovative liberals. Republicans & Democrats use to paintings issues out for the convenience of our human beings & u . s . a .. because of the fact the progressives entered on the scene they have been working at dividing us to take us over. I see anybody working around questioning innovative skill progression. Why do maximum of human beings think of progression is linked with Progressivism? Is it because of the fact the observe progression is in innovative? If this is their foundation. Is Marxism progression? The progressives are their very own social gathering and hijacked the democratic social gathering using the liberal label. The innovative social gathering in no way ought to get all and sundry elected. because of the fact of this they hijacked and are working the democratic social gathering. Progressivism isn't in basic terms an theory however the prepare that the government is conscious terrific and has finished administration and possession over each and every little thing which contain human beings. Progressivism would not have faith in government because it incredibly is now. With that I mean progressivism would not have faith that representation of the human beings is mandatory because of the fact the administrative branch runs each and every little thing and is conscious what's terrific. anybody is the valuables of the government like animals are owned by skill of human beings. there's no such element as peoples rights which contain freedom, privateness, individualism and so on. in case you have ever considered the Borg on celeb Trek that must be comparable. Progressivism operates below the facade of appearing to be a central authority doing what's terrific for the human beings without their enter and silencing all opposition. Progressivism objective is Marxism.
- 1 decade ago