Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

這一篇醫學字 的論文想請各位大大幫幫忙翻譯一下

Any treatment plan for stress fractures must also take into consideration the

inherent and specific risk for further injury. It is helpful when devising a

treatment plan to understand the difference between the “safe” and “high-risk”

stress injury. A stress fracture may be considered higher risk if it has a high

propensity to progress to a complete fracture. In addition, the morbidity associated

with the completed or possibly displaced fracture must also be considered.

Essentially, the higher the risk, the greater the benefit of early surgical intervention

to prevent further morbidity. Ultimately, the final grouping of a stress

fracture into a high- or low-risk category is somewhat arbitrary; the clinician

must be aware of the relative risk associated with each fracture.

2 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Any treatment plan for stress fractures must also take into consideration the

    inherent and specific risk for further injury. It is helpful when devising a

    treatment plan to understand the difference between the “safe” and “high-risk”

    stress injury. A stress fracture may be considered higher risk if it has a high

    propensity to progress to a complete fracture. In addition, the morbidity associated

    with the completed or possibly displaced fracture must also be considered.

    Essentially, the higher the risk, the greater the benefit of early surgical intervention

    to prevent further morbidity. Ultimately, the final grouping of a stress

    fracture into a high- or low-risk category is somewhat arbitrary; the clinician

    must be aware of the relative risk associated with each fracture.

    →任何治療計劃為應力性骨折也必須考慮到

    固有的和具體的風險作進一步損傷。這是幫助時,制訂一套

    治療計劃的理解之間的差別“安全”和“高風險”

    應激損傷。 1應力性骨折可被視為風險較高,如果它有一個高

    傾向的進展,以一個完整的骨折。此外,該發病率相關

    與完成或可能流離失所骨折,還必須考慮。

    基本上,危險性就越高,就越有利於早期手術干預

    以防止進一步的發病率。最終,最後集團的壓力

    骨折成為一個高或低風險類是有點武斷;臨床醫師

    必須認識到的相對危險性與每個骨折。

    希望能幫到你.....

    Source(s): 我自己
    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    任何針對壓迫性骨傷的療程也必須要把潛在的或特殊的二度傷害風險給考慮進去。當設計一個療程時,了解「安全--」與「高風險--壓迫性傷害」的差異性是很有幫助的。

    若壓迫性骨傷演變成完全骨折的傾向越高,要考慮的風險相對越高。此外,完全或可能發生異位性骨折的情況也要考慮進去。

    最重要的是,若風險越高,及早的外科治療能防範二度傷害(更多傷害)就越有成效。

    總的來說,壓迫性骨傷是高或低風險,種類的區分終究是太武斷了。臨床醫師必須要注意各種可能併發骨折的風險所在。

    Source(s): 沒學過醫,高中程度+yahoo字典+Wikipedia
    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.