春秀 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

英文翻譯 與 營養醫學相關要語意通順

麻煩大家了!

Link between deprivation and malnutrition in hospital

Patients at risk of malnutrition (42 %; n 420/1000); 14% medium risk, 28%high risk) were admitted from areas of greater deprivation than those not at risk. The IMD ranks were significantly lower (indicating more deprivation; 3731(2251–6826)) for those at risk of malnutrition with ‘MUST’(medium þ high risk) than those not at risk (low risk, 3946 (603–8375)) on admission to hospital (Fig. 2). Each of the individual ‘MUST’ components showed a similar, significant

relationship with IMD (BMI (P,0·03), percentage weight loss

in 3–6 months (P,0·05), acute disease effect (P,0·05); Fig. 2).

The prevalence of malnutrition risk (medium + high risk) significantly increased with each quartile of deprivation rank (IMD; predicted odds ratio 1·14 (95% CI 1·02, 1·28), binary logistic regression model (low v. medium + high risk),adjusted for age and sex; Table 4). The odds ratio for the IMD (odds of the most deprived quartile (49% malnourished)/

odds of the least deprived quartile (38% malnourished)), when adjusted for age and sex using binary logistic regression, was found to be 1·59 (95% CI 1·11, 2·28; Table 3). The odds ratios according to quartile of deprivation rank (IMD and individual domains) are shown in Table 4. The table also shows results assuming that the ordered categorical

exposure effects (the quartiles of deprivation) are linear (see the table footnote for tests of linearity). Of the individual domains, health deprivation and disability, income and employment deprivation were also significantly greater with increased malnutrition risk (Table 4). Analysis of data according to national quartiles of the IMD and its components gave results similar to those based on local deprivation quartiles.

For example, for malnutrition the odds ratio (most to least deprived national quartiles) was 1·56 (95% CI 1·09, 2·24)instead of 1·59 (95% CI 1·11, 2·28; Table 4).

3 Answers

Rating
  • ari
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    在醫院剝奪和營養不良之間的聯繫

    病人處於危險的營養不良( 42 % ; n千分之四百二) ; 14 % ,中等風險, 28 %的高風險)承認,從地區更大的剝奪比那些不處於危險之中。

    在IMD的排名顯著降低(顯示更多的剝奪; 3731 ( 2251-6826 )對於那些處於危險的營養不良與'必須' (中等高風險) ,比那些沒有風險(低風險, 3946 ( 603-8375 )

    對入院(圖2 ) 。每一個人的'必須'的組成顯示了類似,顯著

    的關係,與IMD的(身體質量指數(磷, 0.03 ) ,體重減輕的百分比

    在3-6個月的( p , 0.05 ) ,急性疾病的影響性( P , 0.05 ) ;圖。 2 ) 。

    普遍營養不良的風險(中等+高風險)顯著增加,與每個四分剝奪級院( IMD ;預言,勝算比1.14 ( 95 % CI為1.02 , 1.28 ) ,二元Logistic回歸模型(低訴中等+高風險) ,調整年齡和性別;表4 ) 。勝算比為發展學院(賠率最貧困的四分位( 49 %營養不良)

    賠率至少剝奪了四分( 38 %營養不良) ) ,當調整年齡和性別使用二進制Logistic回歸,被裁定為1.59 ( 95 % CI為1.11 , 2.28 ;見表3 ) 。勝算比根據四分剝奪級院( IMD和個人網域)是表4所示。

    該表還顯示,結果假設該命令明確 暴露的影響( 25 %剝奪)是線性(見表腳註為測試線性) 。對個別領域,健康,剝奪和殘疾,收入和就業機會被剝奪,也大大增加,營養不良的風險(表4 ) 。的數據進行分析,根據國家的25 %是IMD及其組成了類似的結果,那些基於局部剝奪25 % 。

    例如,對於營養不良的勝算比(最起碼剝奪了全國25 % ) 1.56 ( 95 % CI為1.09 , 2.24 ) ,而不是1.59 ( 95 % CI為1.11 , 2.28 ;表4 ) 。

    希望對你有幫助

    Source(s): 網路
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    到下面的網址看看吧

    ▶▶http://qoozoo09260.pixnet.net/blog

  • 1 decade ago

    連接在剝奪和營養不良之間在住院病人在危險中營養不良(42 %; n 420/1000); 14% 中等風險, 28%high 風險) 比那些被承認了從更加偉大的剝奪範圍不是在危險中。IMD 等級是顯著更低(表明更多剝奪; 3731(2251-6826)) 為那些在危險中營養不良以` MUST'(medium □.. 風險) 比那些不是在危險中(低風險, 3946 (603-8375)) 在入場對醫院(圖2) 。每個單獨` 必須' 組分顯示了與IMD 的一個相似, 重大關係(BMI (P, 0.03), 百分比減重在3-6 個月(P, 0.05), 深刻疾病作用(P, 0.05); 圖2)

    營養不良風險(媒介的流行+ 高風險) 極大增加了以剝奪等級各方照(IMD; 被預言的可能性比率1.14 (95% CI 1.02, 1.28), 二進制邏輯斯諦的退化模型(低v. 媒介+ 高risk), 被調整為年齡和性; 表4)

    。可能性比率為IMD (被剝奪的方照(49% malnourished)/

    可能性的可能性最少被剝奪的方照(38% 營業不良)), 當調整為年齡和性使用二進制邏輯斯諦的退化, 被發現1.59 (95% CI 1.11, 2.28; 表3) 。可能性比率根據剝奪等級(IMD 和各自的領域) 方照被顯示在表4 。桌並且顯示結果假設, 被定□的絕對曝光作用(剝奪方照) 線性(參見桌腳註為線性測試) 。各自的領域, 健康剝奪和傷殘、收入和就業剝奪

    函函@@

    Source(s): 自己
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.