Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Would you like the USA to invade Pakistan to get Osama?
Recently, candidate Obama has said again that he is in favor of invading Pakistan in order to attack Al-Queda there. Last year, he was talking the same way and people were wondering why he was sounding more aggressive than Bush was at the time.
Pakistan has more people than Russia, a strong conventional army, and atomic weapons. It is also a US ally.
Kindly forgetting about the great Republican vs. Democrat struggle in the USA, what do you think about starting a bigger war than ever, Americans? How alone do you want to be in the world?
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Attacking Pakistan for only 1 Osama will make 100000 Osama bin laden in Pakistan.
First USA should give Pakistan the proper and latest equipment to seal its border with Afghanistan then criticize Pakistan, I wonder how Americans can only blame Pakistan for Taliban attacks? Since all 35 NATO nations are in Afghanistan with their latest equipments USA itself is there with the number one technology in the whole world, Afghanistan should care about its borders but yet the whole world and specially USA blame only only only PAKISTAN.
We all know that USA can't secure its easy border with Mexico with its world number one technology but they expect Pakistan to secure its Mountainous border with Afghanistan, i just wonder on the hypocrisy of Americans.
Securing Pakistan Afghanistan border is a joint joint joint responsibility of all NATO and specially AMERICA & Afghanistan & then PAKISTAN.
And Pakistan has lost more troops & civilians than USA or any other country for this so called war on terror.
USA and WEST first look at their deeds then point out their fingers on Pakistan, USA must must must give Pakistan the latest spying equipments otherwise they should not expect something from Pakistan which is not possible even from them.
Bush praises Pakistan in terror fight - South and Central Asia - MSNBC.com
Dozens of soldiers missing in Pakistan tribal area - Yahoo! News
Pakistani army holds fire for funerals of 250
Pakistan troops die in gun battle
US-led coalition fire kills 4 Pakistanis
Pakistan bombards suspected Taliban hideouts
Pakistan blames US coalition for troops' death
only such links list just goes on and on and on………
AND LIST GOES ON AND ON AND ONNNNNNNNN, All USA is doing providing ARMS & having nuclear deals to Pakistan’s number ONE enemy India and despite of that asking Pakistan to do all for them. WOW what a friend USA is of Pakistan.
& REMEMMBER THAT “PAKISTAN IS NOT AN COUNTRY SO USA OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY MAKE THEIR MOVE AND GET AWAY WITH IT”.
USA only like those democracy which supports its goals and objectives, they don't like truly elected democracy. Most current examples are Hamas (elected by people but rejected by USA), Iran's president (elected by people but rejected by USA).
USA supported the dictatorship of Musharraf and they still not saying to him to leave the president house, now tell me what’s that?
All USA has is just "double standards".
***What USA has done for Pakistan, in order to stop this, they must help Pakistan this is their duty, b/c if Pakistan leave USA in supporting in their so called fight against terrorism all suicidal attacks will start occurring in USA.?***
- 1 decade ago
Question is ,,,why???to save america??tell me one thing please..why is it America thats always in danger and to protect it we have to destroy every other country in the world....why .......have we done something worng ??and let me add they dont just have a conventional army and atomic weapons ,thats the only islamic country with atomic power ,they are kinda popular in muslim world...so they day we invade pakistan it will become a crusade and just a muslim christian war.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I don't see it being necessary or helpful. All options should always be available....but we should be slow to go to war.....only doing so when it's absolutely necessary.....and then acting only in a decisive and ruthless manner to win.
- 1 decade ago
This will be repeating the mistakes of USSR