Thomas has no case. First, inspite of which branch of the business enterprise he grew to become into working in initially, he grew to become into working for a business enterprise that brazenly had a "defense force" branch as you stated. for this reason, he supported the corporate movements. except he had pre-customary no flow clauses in his settlement, the business enterprise could be loose to go him to a clean place, and he's loose to the two settle for that place or terminate his employment. there grew to become into no 1st modification violation, no longer even close.