小K asked in 政治與政府法律與道德 · 1 decade ago

請問可以幫我中翻英文章嗎 ?10點謝謝

1.這篇文章是說,有位先生把剛幫小朋友換下的尿布,丟在台北市專用垃圾筒而被罰錢,還有有人帶家裡的狗狗出去散步,而撿回的糞便,同樣丟入台北市專用垃圾筒,同樣被罰錢,民眾紛紛討論說,為什麼把垃圾丟在台北市專用垃圾筒會被罰錢,為什麼台北市專用垃圾筒使供應給行人丟垃圾,有必要分成這樣嗎?

2.我覺得垃圾筒不就是丟垃圾的地方,為什麼要分成行人垃圾和不是行人垃圾,那假如那個人家住很遠,只是去台北玩,垃圾不就要帶回家丟,所以阿這條罰款太不合理了,假如要分成這樣,降子乾脆就不要設立垃圾桶阿!

1 Answer

Rating
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    希望我小小的力量 可以幫到你喔~~

    There is a Mr. ba just help children change under de diaper, throw but cover punish money at Taipei City's for special purpose dustbin, still have someone bring domestic dag go out take a stroll, but pick up come back de dung, same throw enter Taipei City's for special purpose dustbin, same punished money, civilian respectively discuss say, why throw rubbish can cover punish money at Taipei City's for special purpose dustbin, why's Taipei City's for special purpose dustbin make supply to passerby throw rubbish, there is necessary divided into this?

    I feel dustbin not exactly throw rubbish de place, why want divided into passerby's rubbish and not passerby's rubbish, that if that's individual the family lives very far, just go Taipei play, rubbish not be going to bring go home throw, so a this' an amercement very not reasonable, suppose want divided into this, fall son straightforward not establish wastebin's !

    這些是我用電腦翻譯的!!

    Source(s): 電腦
    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.