Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Entertainment & MusicMovies · 1 decade ago

Hannibal Lecter vs John Doe?

Hannibal Lecter vs John Doe (villain from Seven)

Who would win? Why?

Update:

Liked this match up? Check out my blog at w00tpwnage.com for all the best vs action

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    wow, intriguing. well, lecter was kinda one note, and he wasn't seeking to punish people or make a statement. he killed and ate people b/c it was his fetish and an environment thing (gotta read hannibal rising). now john doe, is cunning and inventive. lecter is just vicious. it's a toss up. i would go lecter b/c he is a bit more intellectual and although doe is cunning, lecter would see it a mile away.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Karen
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Hannibal Lecter

    • Login to reply the answers
  • SpAzZz
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Hannibal Lecter of course

    why because hes smarter

    yup

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Hannibal Lecter of course ... he's very intelligent.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Hannibal Lecter.

    He is a classic character who has stood the test of time and will continue to do so. He is charming, cool, calm, collected and massively intelligent. he doesn't need brute force but can provide it if necessary.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    John Doe

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Sis F
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    have to say Hannibal Lecter. he was more intelligent and sneaky about what he did. He would probably poison John Doe and eat him.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Hannibal! He's a stealthy lil' sh*t! Do you remember how he got out of his new prison in Silence of the Lambs? He killed the guard, cut his face off and put it on and dumped the body. Then he proceeded to act as the dying guard who got attacked until he was in the ambulence. Then he killed everyone in there and hijacked the thing. I don't think anyone could do him in!

    Sidenote to Sonja B: I did read Hannibal Rising, and if I recall correctly he kills and eats those he finds rude! He isn't a senseless killer. He still has his morals. They don't have to do with right and wrong, but rather with courtesy and social graces. He even gets pissy with Clarice because she says "thanks" rather than "thank you."

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Great question.

    I love both "villans". Each have their own set of personal "morals and standards".

    Who would win? my cash is with Hannibal. He does not want fame by his doing, he is motivated by something far more deep. Therefore, my choice is Hannibal.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    I like Hannibal. He has a really creepy side!

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.