Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

部分醫學期刊翻譯....誠徵英文高手...贈20點

This pilot randomized controlled trial study tested

the feasibility of a 10-week cardiac rehabilitation

programme, demonstrating its efficacy with

significant increases in fitness parameters of VO2

and RPE and cardiac risk score reduction in the

intervention group.

No significant improvements were noted in

health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indices

or cardiovascular–metabolic profiles. Decreased

HADS depression scores on final testing in the

active group does however suggest an associated

increase in well-being. As a pilot study with

relatively small numbers, limited power to

demonstrate health status and functional benefits

exists.

2 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    這項具有對照組的前導性隨機臨床試驗研究,檢驗了“10週心臟復健計畫”的可行性,並且由治療組中攝氧量(VO2)及自覺運動強度(RPE)兩項健康參數的顯著進步,以及心臟風險分數的下降,證明此項計畫確有成效。

    無論是健康相關生活品質(HRQoL)指數,或是心血管-代謝相關檢驗的數據,均無明顯改善。不過,由於活動組在最後測試時醫院焦慮與憂鬱量表(HADS)的憂鬱分數降低,暗示復健計畫還是有助於受試者的健康。因為這項前導研究的受試者數目相對較少,因此證明(復健計畫)對健康狀態與生理功能確有效益的能力有限。

    Source(s): 我是醫檢師、專業翻譯
  • 1 decade ago

    控制測試的審訊研究,這名飛行員隨機化排列

    10 周的心臟的恢復的可行性

    計畫,證明它的效力用

    顯著的VO2的健康參數的增加

    並且RPE 和心臟冒的危險得分削減在方面

    干涉組。

    沒有顯著改進如表明

    與健康有關的生活質量(HRQoL)指標

    或者心血管的Vmetabolic 外形。 減少

    HADS 沮喪得分在上最後測試在裡

    但是活躍的組建議聯繫

    在安寧過程中增加。 作為一試點研究有

    相對小數量,把能力限制在

    證明健康地位和功能的好處

    存在。

    希望這能幫到你拉~

    Source(s):
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.