請幫我中翻英2篇短文ˇ20點!急!=ˇ=

麻煩 幫我中翻英這兩篇ˇ卸卸大家哩=)

《第一篇》

  死刑是好的嗎?如果說,只要犯重罪就得死刑,那麼冤獄者呢?當正義的一槍打下去,要是哪天平反了冤獄,即使再多的錢也彌補不回來一條生命。雖然他們罪有應得,但現在是個文明的社會,應該有更好的辦法來制裁他們,而不是光靠個死刑來防犯罪。

  當支持廢除死刑的人遇到了殺人犯,把自己原本美滿的家庭搞得支離破碎,這都是有可能發生的事。人有活著的權利,生命是不可被剝奪的。然而,殺人犯卻安全的在監獄裡享受著遮風避雨的免費牢房,他不需要檢討自己,他只需要在監獄裡假裝知道自己錯了,然後再出來犯罪,這樣殺人犯將會以倍數的成長。

  如果沒有死刑,這社會的人們還有警惕心嗎?最貼近我們生活周遭的殺人犯,讓我們膽顫心驚,因為他們是不定時炸彈,隨時都有可能出現在我們身邊,要是沒有死刑,他們會有所節制嗎?所以,死刑的存在是這個混亂的社會所必須的。

《第二篇》

  社會大眾都有知的權利。狗仔隊的最終目的,不外乎是揭發真相、弊案,有時候,真的功不可沒。但是藝人也有屬於他們隱私的地方。所以,我覺得狗仔隊在拍東西時,還是要適可而止。

  但是有時候狗仔隊卻可以讓我們看清一個公眾人物的面目。也或許是看狗仔隊的心態問題吧,但是媒體和記者都是互相的。藝人沒有媒體,不會出名,媒體沒有藝人,沒新聞寫。所以,我相信只要藝人和狗仔隊之間找出一條規範的話,我相信他們可以和平共處的!

Update:

盡量用一些高一下程度的字彙,文法要完全正確ˇ

希望不要是用網路翻譯的,我是要參加演講比賽的ˇ

請大家多多幫忙哩~ 卸卸ˇ

1 Answer

Rating
  • ky
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    《第一篇》

    Is the death penalty good? If say, as long as make grave crime have to death penalty, so miscarriage of justice? When a gun of the justice beats bottom, if which the weighing scales was anti- miscarriage of justice, even again many money also makes up not to come back a life. Although they deserve it, now is civilization of society, should have better way to come to sanctions they, not light depend on death penalty to defend a crime.When support abrogation death penalty of the person met murderer, oneself the originally happy family make fragmented and disorganized, all of this are the matter that may take place. The person has alive right, the life can't be deprived. However, murderer but security of enjoy to shield from wind to seek shelter from rain in the jail of free prison building, he doesn't need to examine oneself, he only needs affectation in the jail to know oneself was wrong, then came out a crime, so murderer will with the growth of multiple.

    2008-04-08 22:40:55 補充:

    如果沒有死刑,這社會的人們還有警惕心嗎?最貼近我們生活周遭的殺人犯,讓我們膽顫心驚,因為他們是不定時炸彈,隨時都有可能出現在我們身邊,要是沒有死刑,他們會有所節制嗎?所以,死刑的存在是這個混亂的社會所必須的。

    2008-04-08 22:42:10 補充:

    If there is no death penalty, do this social people still have vigilance heart? Come close our living whole murdererses most , let our Dan Zhan scared, because they aren't time bombs,

    2008-04-08 22:42:31 補充:

    at any time all appear probably at us nearby, were it not for death penalty, they would have forbearance? So, the existence of the death penalty is the have to of.

    2008-04-08 22:43:18 補充:

    《第二篇》

    2008-04-08 22:43:46 補充:

    The society all have the right for knowing. The doorstepping journalist's final purpose, not outside is reveal true facts, corruption, sometimes and really perform feats.

    2008-04-08 22:43:59 補充:

    But the entertainer also have a place of belonging to their privacy. So, I feel the doorstepping journalist still wants while clapping thing proper can and.

    2008-04-08 22:44:40 補充:

    But sometimes doorstepping journalist but can show us a facial expression of pure public person. Also is the mindset problem which sees a doorstepping journalist probably, but media and reporters are all mutual.

    2008-04-08 22:44:49 補充:

    The entertainer has no media, not famious, the media have no entertainer, having no news to write. So, I believe as long as the words which find out a standard of the of entertainer and doorstepping journalist, I believe they can get along peacefully!

    Source(s): 翻譯ok, ^^, ^^, ^^, ^^, ^^, ^^, ^^
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.