Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Did you know that Dan Rather`s Reports about Bush were True, 100% TRUE!?

Even though Dan admitted that the fact checkers did,nt do a very good job, The press never reported the fact that Bush Dodged his duties in Viet Nam and the Dan Rather Report was proven 100% Accurate! Is it fair to the American People that we have to take Repub. spin as fact?

Update:

Thats just it ,The documents were NOT forged. Just because the Republicans have NO problem Lying to the American People does not make it true. Dan should have stood his ground!

22 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No, it isn't fair that we must accept Republican spin as fact. It, also, isn't fair that Dan Rather was forced out of his position for his report. Nor, is it fair that we've had to endure the crap that we are going through when the idiotic, active-duty dodger didn't even win the popular vote.

    Thank God our national nightmare is almost over!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    First to say the reports were 100% true is very disengenuous. Dan rather used false documents to support his research. Without those documents he only had one person who said, "I don't remember seeing George show up for duty all the time."

    Remember the actual allegation. That Bush skipped his duty times. His commander at the time backed Bush up... that is why the documents became so important.

    This was never about Vietnam. Everybody knows his dad pulled strings and got him stateside duty.

    This was about if he fulfilled his stateside duty requirements.

    Rather couldn't prove his story.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Sad little Monkey, you've not proven your point . All you've done is rant like the typical Moonbat with BDS...

    Show a Link that the report was 100% accurate bobo and you'll get a banana

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Were to start... The papers were fake!! they were made on a word document not a typewriter!!

    He was never in Vietnam!! He was a pilot in the Air National Guard.

    Were is your prove they were 100% accurate?

    Do you know what BSD is? I hate to tell you but you have it and I don't think there is a cure.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They were not true.

    Dan Rather published a memo which he claimed was written by George W. Bush's commanding officer.

    That memo was stripped apart and the information Dan Rather had so easily discredited that Mr. Rather had to fall back on to a comment by the former commanding officer's secretary, a registered Democrat, who claimed that even though the memo was not written by the commanding officer she believed it represented his beliefs.

    Unfortunately for both her and Dan Rather the commanding officer represented exactly to opposite in GWB's Evaluation Report. While not exactly stunning the evaluation report contradicted both the memo and the comments by the secretary.

    "But as the first document suggests, months before, Killian — and Harris — had quite decisively declined to rate Bush's performance. If Killian was under pressure to "sugar coat" Bush's performance, he had certainly not yielded to it. Nor had anyone else "sugar coated" the Bush evaluation."

    Source(s): Not a stellar source, but, reasonably accurate. http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york20040910080... PDF copies of the evaluations are on line and I am already bored with trying to teach illiterates. Okay, so here is the link for literates: http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/bush_records/
    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Nurse, Nurse, you need to readjust the meds. What are you talking about. Lies, proven lies, admitted lies, and this spews forth like the babbling of a newborn.

    Substance of the story. A fabricated piece of evidence that idiots identified as a fake within minutes of broadcast. Listening to liberals just reinforces that we need to vote for anyone they don't support. The idiocy of giving credence to lies speaks volumes.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It is horse sh*t just like most of the stuff coming out of this presidential government.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    I guess the fact that they are forged means nothing to your liberal mind. I guess you prefer the liberal spin!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Tin foil man, Tin Foil.

    Hint: Go with a Brand name, it's better at deflecting harmful Alpha Waves.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.