The actor-observer effect?
It refers to the tendency to attribute ones own behaviour to situational factors (ie.behave that way because of the situation you are in), and to attribute others behaviour to dispositional factors (ie. they acted that way because that is there personality).
This is a well known bias in cognitive psychology and has very strong research to back it up.
So, when doing an experiment about how people attribute dangerous driving, and you get a result that people made more dispositional attributions about their own behaviour than others (ie. they were more likely to say that they drove dangerously because it is their personality than that others did) why could it be??
Im stuck trying to figure out why dangerous driving attributions would not be liable to the actor-observer effect!
Thanks for any ideas
just to clear up any confusion, I do know what the actor-observer effect is and what the results of this experiment should look like, but they didn't.