You might argue in court that you were not signing the "paperwork" but rather the notation you made. But of course these days the underhanded is applauded by the courts; conservatives are in after all and they are all underhanded, to a man. How else could they sanction the murder of honest policemen by contras and Al Qaida operatives running dope?
(Yes, I know you thought we were at war with Al Qaida ~ aren't you the good little follower of the propaganda machine???)
The truth is I was shot in 1981 by US operatives running dope for the Contras (I was a Provisional Deputy 'Game Warden'). The truth is the USA all but admits that Al Qaida was a primary money laundering asset in this operation.
So, your courts are fully corrupt and if your silly enough to worry about piddling things like dishonesty, well your bound to loose.
Living it. Was divorced from a woman killed in 1988. The divorce however happened in 1998! Oh yeah, I'm a Liberal (I do not like drug dealers or abusers ~ the new functional definition of Liberal). I was shot 13 times in one day on the job with my badge and .357. But I "must" earn no less than $30,000 per year ~ or else I'm not a good American, and thus can't work at all, or drive a car, or patent a new Cancer Treatment if I could cure Cancer. Could courts get more corrupt? In Maine, they must offer a jury trial for divorces of over $100,000. not counting property lost but merely the decree for child support I was ordered to pay over that! In Maine they cannot assess child support to the mentally ill, given they "lost" the record of my head wounds, liver wounds, loss of both kidneys etc. they concluded my sympims were of insanity. So strike three for court credibility. One: no jury trial. Two: no assessment possible against those "found" mentally ill. Three: "wife" was dead nearly ten years prior to judgement of divorce. Do you have "faith" in partisan court warfare?