Something like this has something to do with it?
According to the Wall Street Journal editorial: "During the 1992 campaign, the Clintons claimed to be coming clean by releasing their tax returns from 1980 forward. But they steadfastly refused to release their returns for prior years, and only later did we learn that 1978 and 1979 were the tax years when Mrs. Clinton reported her 10,000% cattle-futures trading profit."
Since, the Clintons left the WH, they made tons of money.
The high speech fees are something we know already.
That's not the part of the possible problem.
The shady business transactions are in big question.
Was there some political favors involved?
What is the link between their earnings and/or donations and their library donors. Was there undue influences?
What are the main income sources? Tax havens?
Too many questions are left unanswered.
· 1 decade ago