Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會及文化語言 · 1 decade ago

煩請改文法~

With regard to the second principle, the cost of something is what you give up to get it. Firms compare between the costs and benefits, and the opportunity cost is their business volume生意額. In order to continue to increase the price of the meats, they have to give up the resident purchases the determination of the meats. It is the relevant cost for decision making.

唔好話我知岩晒,因為我知有錯!

4 Answers

Rating
  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    According to the second principle, the opportunity cost refers to something you give up to get another. Firms will make comparision between cost and benefit because the opportunity cost is their turnover. In order to keep the meats' price going up, firms have to give up the residents' determination of purchasing meats. It is the cost relative to decision-making .

    Hope this helps!

  • flora
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    En ce qui concerne le deuxième principe, est le coût de quelque

    chose ce que vous donnez l'obtenez jusqu'à. Les sociétés comparent

    entre les coûts et les avantages, et le coût d'opportunité est leur

    volume des affaires . Afin de continuer à augmenter le prix des

    viandes, ils doivent renoncer le résidant à des achats la

    détermination des viandes. C'est le coût approprié pour la prise de

    décision

  • 1 decade ago

    With regard to the second principle, the cost of something is what you give up to get it. Firms compare between the costs and benefits "along with" the opportunity cost is their business volume. In order to continue "increasing the price of meats", they have to give up the "residential demands" of the meats. It is the relevant cost for decision making.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    I'm really unsure about if there are grammatical mistakes in this essay. Just try to re-write a bit as per the below. Please just regard this as a reference. :)

    With regard to the second principle, the cost of something is what you give up to get it. Firms compare between the costs and benefits "along with" the opportunity cost is their business volume. In order to continue "increasing the price of meats", they have to give up the "residential demands" of the meats. It is the relevant cost for decision making.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.