I'll put this into simple terms that even somebody as dimwitted as you can understand. Simple probability cannot be used to calculate the odds of protein formation. And, the same Yale scientist that you claimed supported creation, Dr. Morowitz, said that the order of formation of macromolecules would be lipids, phosphorylated compounds, keto acids, amino acids, nitrogen bases, cofactors, and coding molecules. Considering that amino acids are fourth on the list, and that the presence of the other molecules would enhance their chances of forming, you cannot use simple probability to calculate the chances of a protein forming; i.e, you can't just multiply the numbers. To accurately cacluate the probability would require several probability density functions and high order differential equations of several variables. These equations are extremely difficult to solve. That's why I gave you the example I did. Remember what I said? It took over 100 years and three supercomputers to solve the Schrodinger equation (a second order partial differential equation) for the breakup of a hydrogen molecule by a photon. It's not grade school math like you seem to wish it was. But I wouldn't expect someone who still does math with a crayon to comprehend this (since you seem to think that odds of 1-10^45 are impossible, I'll assume you can't even handle simple subtraction; or at least getting your signs right). You're stuck on thinking you can just multiply the number of proteins by the number times the proteins must combine to calculate the probability of them forming. Sorry, we're not rolling dice here (but cheer up, you did calculate the number of possible proteins of that strand length). Molecular interactions are not random and the presence of certain molecules can enhance specific reactions and retard others. Like I told you before, NOBODY CAN CALCULATE THE ODDS OF LIFE FORMING UNDER ANY CONDITIONS.
Archie, what you need to do is pull your johnson out of the bible and try doing some real thinking. I know that the idea of having a woman made from one of your ribs is a turn on; but, and try to stay with me here, if you actually could use that pile of sh!t between your ears that up until this point had the sole purpose of directing you to copy and paste trash from the garbage minds of creationist bible thumpers whose favorite past time is rubbing the book of genesis on their nipples, then you might actually be able to see that the world extends far beyond that bubble that you've so delicately wrapped yourself up in and periodically extend a hand from to copy, paste, and just regurgitate the bullsh!t that fits your childish view of life and the universe in general.
Holy savior on a cross. I nearly fell out of my chair. I'm misleading??!! Have you looked back at your pathetic quote mining and misrepresentation of the works of some very brilliant men? Are you completely retarted?
Sorry to burst that little bubble of yours again, but that calculation is correct. Hold on, keep reading. You've correctly calculated the number of possible proteins that have a length of 445 left handed amino acids if you have twenty to choose from, order doesn't matter, and the supply can be determined as infinite (meaning that choosing one doesn't change the number of available choices). Welcome to your first day of introductory statistics. It's so sad that chemistry isn't random (if it was then it's a crime for how much I get paid to research cancer drugs; you know, seeing how it's all just random).
Now stay with me, I'm almost done. What you've done is calculate a simple probability. You have a single variable (an amino acid). Now what you neglected to account for is the fact that if you wanted to calculate the actual odds, you'd have to do those calculation using multiple variables. And here's where it gets tricky. The variables are NOT independant. I could sit here and explain further but I just want that to sink into your pathetically feable mind. After it registers that you've based your rant on trash, you can crawl out of the corner, wipe the tears from your eyes, and post some more pathetic trash that I could tear to shreds drunk with your girl's toungue gently lapping my balls.
You accuse me of being misleading when you misrepresent the works of scientists. You accuse me of losing civility when you call me out in a previous rant using insults. You accuse me of being an atheist when I've never made any indications of my religious preference. You're a fraud Archie, plain and simple. You've never contributed to the advancement of science in any way and you spend your days searching creationist websites to post their worthless drivle on yahoo in the hopes of appearing somewhat intelligent. I've grown tired of pointing out how dumb you are so I now leave you with your own insecurities and irrational beliefs. It was entertaining while it lasted but I have better things to do and it's obvious that you don't want a scientific debate. You want to lie and attack science using unsubstantiated claims and misrepresenting the work of scientists (by the way, Morowitz is a biophysicist who wrote extensively about the feasability of chemical evolution, and has performed numerous experiments verifying that several biologically neccesary molecules can spontenously form). You've become a pathetic novelty in this forum and will never be educated, will never contribute to society, and will never do anything beyond anonymously ranting on answers.