I purely regarded it up on youtube, and till i'm gazing the incorrect one, there is not any longer something offensive approximately what I observed. (and that i'm a woman) yet even previous that commercial, I completely consider you. All this talk approximately this or that objectifying women persons. women persons objectify themselves. If she chooses to be an underclothes kind, then it is her selection as long as that's thoroughly out of loose will. Now, if she have been compelled to be an underclothes kind whilst she didnt prefer to be one, *then* i could call it objectifying. comparable factor with different stuff, different advertisements, television exhibits, or maybe porn. And if it objectifies women persons, then the comparable issues additionally must objectify adult men, so those human beings had greater effective be asserting the comparable factor the subsequent time they see sexy guy in underclothes. i think of a few human beings have tried so difficult to get women persons removed from being considered an merchandise (and make no mistake, at one think approximately our very cutting-edge background, women persons have been actually products - cloth sources that did no longer have their very own rights....), that the laptop crowd calls something that attracts interest to a girl's sensuality or sexuality objectifying.