若琪
Lv 7
若琪 asked in 政治與政府法律與道德 · 1 decade ago

中翻英-不應廢除死刑

這是我們期末考的題目:是否廢除死刑(我是反對)

以下,麻煩請幫我翻譯成英文,盡量別用譯言堂翻

如果有較難的句子,意思相同就可以。

是否廢除死刑,這個頗受爭議的話題在最近這幾年一直被熱烈討論著。我想,這個問題應從幾個方面下去加以探討:

一、司法制度:

死刑這個刑罰的目的是藉由剝奪個人的生命權來保障社會的安寧與利益,而負責執行和審判的即是監獄和法院。 監獄和法院及是所謂的司法機構,根據資料顯示美國的司法機構對於死刑的誤判率是七比一,也就是每八件被判為死刑的案子裡有一件是誤判,這個比率是非常高的。值得一提的是,美國司法制度的嚴謹是世界有名的,如此的國家都會有如此高的誤判率,何況台灣!但是,死刑就因為如此要被廢除嗎?我想不是的,取而代之的是我們需要一套更完善且嚴謹的司法制度來維護並保障死刑這個刑罰。因為我國自古以來的定律是『殺人者償命』,這個定律是我國立法的重要部份,也因此它在我們的心中是根深蒂固的,是不容去破壞的,因為那將動搖國本,使人心動盪不安!

二、人權:

有人在反對死刑的原因是他們認為死刑犯有人權,關於這點我是非常反對的!沒錯,死刑犯在還沒犯下足以讓他被判死刑的案子時,他是有人權的,可是一旦他犯刑時,那就只是一頭會傷人、發狂的野獸,不是人!至少不是正常人!我國的刑法對於無意識殺人及自衛殺人是不會給予死刑的處罰的,所以他們既然剝奪了他人的生命,把他人的生命視為糞土,那我們何必把他的生命當寶,還在盡力替他維護所謂的人權,這不只是不必要,因為那根本是浪費!

三、經濟及社會問題:

就經濟面而言,死刑比終身監禁還要更節省成本,至少我個人是如此認為!而我想納稅人應該不會花錢去養一個隨時會爆發的不定時炸彈吧!尤其是台灣地小人稠,更不可能有地方去安置他們。

因此基於上列幾點,我個人是反對廢除死刑的

1 Answer

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Should capital punishment be abolished? This controversial topic has

    been under heated debates for the last few years. I would like to address this issue with the following points:

    1. Legal perspective

    The punishment known as death sentence seeks to preserve the peacefulness and benefits of the society through the deprivation of

    one's life, and the enforcement and judgment is served by jail and

    court.

    Jail and court is known as the legal institutions. According to some

    studies, the US legal institutes has a misjudgment ratio of seven to

    one. In other words, every eight death sentence issued, one was

    wrongfully accused, this is very high ratio.

    Whats noteworthy is, the US legal system is world renowned for its

    stringency. Even a country like US has such a high ratio, not to

    mention Taiwan. But, should death sentence be abolished because of

    this reason? I think not. Instead, we need a more comprehensive and

    exact legal system to protect and enforce death sentence.

    Because the principle of our culture is "Killers pay with their

    lives". This principle is deep-rooted in our minds, its absolute,

    because if its challenged, it will waver the foundation of the country,

    and bring about social unrest.

    2. Human rights perspective

    One of the reason some people object the death sentence is because

    they think the convicts have human rights too, to this I strongly

    object! It is true that death sentenced convicts have rights too, but

    that is before they committed the crime that is worthy of death

    sentence. Once they did, they became a crazy and fatally dangerous

    beast, no longer a human being! At least, not a normal human being!

    The laws of our country does not punish one with death sentence if you

    kill in the act of self-defense or negligence, so if they took others

    live willingly, treats other's lives as junk, then we have no reason

    to treasure their lives, and waste our efforts preserving his so-called

    human rights, not only is it unnecessary, it is a complete waste!

    字數不夠

    剩下的塞在意見裡

    2007-12-27 15:49:42 補充:

    3. Economical and society perspective

    In terms of economics, death sentence is cheaper than life sentence, at

    least personally I believe that is the case!

    2007-12-27 15:50:40 補充:

    And I do not think tax payers should spend money to feed an unpredictable timed bomb!

    Especially in Taiwan, a place with such small land yet high density of

    population, there is no room for them.

    Based on the stated points, I personally oppose the abolishment of

    death sentences.

    Source(s): me!
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.