Mitchell report hearsay/ incomplete?

Some of the players had actual evidence against them, while others had no substantial evidence against them other than someone else saying they did it. How is this fair to those players. Also, who really believes that only 85 players have used steroids out of the thousands that have played the game in the last 2... show more Some of the players had actual evidence against them, while others had no substantial evidence against them other than someone else saying they did it. How is this fair to those players. Also, who really believes that only 85 players have used steroids out of the thousands that have played the game in the last 2 decades? How can records and statistics be fairly stricken, as some people want, when there is no 100% way to know for sure who has taken steroids and who hasn't? The Mitchell report took 20 months, yet is incomplete, and does not provide a lot in the way of hard, factual evidence.
3 answers 3