Does our current law allow separate but equal facilities?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No.

    The repeal of "separate but equal" laws was a key focus of the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s. In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), attorneys for the NAACP referred to the phrase "equal but separate" used in Plessy v. Ferguson as a custom de jure racial segregation enacted into law. The NAACP, led by later Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, was successful in challenging the constitutional viability of the separate but equal doctrine, and the court voted to overturn sixty years of law that had developed under Plessy. The Supreme Court outlawed segregated public education facilities for blacks and whites at the state level. The companion case of Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 outlawed such practices at the Federal level in the District of Columbia. In 1967 under Loving v. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court declared Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute, the "Racial Integrity Act of 1924", unconstitutional, thereby ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage ("anti-miscegenation laws") in the United States.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Amy W
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    I think only for having separate restrooms for women & for men.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It shouldn't and what does it matter, anyway? I have nothing against sharing bathrooms with someone of another race. As for dirty homeless people with drug habits, that is another matter.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.