Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 1 decade ago

Science vs. Religion: Should the theory of "Intelligent Currents" be taught instead of Circuit Theory?

Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has recently been investigating Circuit Theory and discovered that it is all wrong. First of all, circuit theory is just a theory which means that it's only a guess, just like the theory of evolution.

According to circuit theory, when a circuit is completed, a current flows through the circuit. But how does the current know when the circuit is completed? The current is at the beginning of the circuit, so how does it know what is happening at the end?

The answer is that God designed currents to have intelligence. Currents know when the circuit is complete because of this intelligence. A current that obeys God's law waits until the circuit is complete before flowing.

Shouldn't the Law of Intelligent Currents be taught to electricians instead of the outdated Circuit Theory?

25 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes.

    I think the new unit for electrical current should be called the Electromotive Farce.

    lmao

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I have a better idea.

    If god created intellegent circuits, he must have created lesser intellegent circuits. Which means there are also circuits that do not obey "god's will" becuse intellegence is a byproduct of free thought. So ofcording to intellegent current the next time I start my car and it wont turn over, its becuse my car is possesed and the circuits are refusing to go like god wants them to be. So instead of taking my car to a mechanic to have my spark plugs changed i should take it to a church and have it blessed?

    Theories are only theories becuse they work. If it dosent work, its not a real scientific theory.

    Also you need to learn some defeinitions. like the definition of a scientific theory as opposed to a normal theory.

    Scientific theories are the abstraction from a large number of different tests and a resultant principle. In order to achieve the status of theory a principle ( This is triple for chemistry and physics) must be close to perfect. It can only have a small amount f error. Circuit theory is right becuse it is 100%.

    Also take a look into the behaviour of electricity . Thats all the proof I would need but being as im not a physics kind of guy i'll leave that to someone who is.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    You didn't even mention that the 3rd law of thermodynamics proves the circuit theory wrong. The 3rd law proves that circuits will always end at chaos, where the entropy hits it maximum. This means it isn't possible for a circuit to start, once it is ended, unless a created starts it again.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No it shouldn't, what a terrible thesis. Currents don't 'know' anything. They just are what they are, its like a plant, it doesn't know it's spring it just reacts to conditions, otherwise plants would grow on a schedule and could not be tricked into blooming when man applies the known conditions.

    Unfortunately, Intelligent Design theories are just theories and that means they haven't been proven so it's only a guess and one guess is just as good as the next one.

    So having agreed on that point, the teaching of any Theory is a good thing.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Just curious, did you know that J>B>S> Haldane, wrote in "The Origin of Life" in 1928 that the theory that life can arise spontaneously from nonliving chemicals is specultative and will remain so until living creatures have been synthesized in the biochemical laboratory, and we are a long way from that goal"

    That was wrote by one on your side, and now 80 years later, that goal is even further away than ever. That is of course unless you have found a instance where life spontaneously arose from where no life had previouly exsited before.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Lol....I mean.....lol.

    I am an electronics technician with over 32 years experience. I can tell you that we are a very long way from being able to construct anything intelligent using electricity. It is man who uses components to control the flow of electrons, not the electron. There are blueprints we follow to perform certain tasks. Remove the power and nothing happens.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Even teaching physics at all is anti-god! All the rules you need to know are in ancient books; don't worry your pretty little head about the "laws" of the universe. Next thing you'll be telling us is the world is round!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    What is Science?

    Science is a study about a particular thing. Science can only be little lower than the real. As long as research is on the Science is little lower.

    assumption is not Science, it is study.

    What is Religion?

    Set of Beliefs and Rituals based on Beliefs.

    Any belief is no longer a belief if it is Real.

    As per your Belief, you will behave.

    There is no cheating with out belief.

    One should be wise to know 'what is what?'

    Source(s): own
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    You are right! How can the current take the right direction if not by conscious intelligence!

    We should start to build laws to protect currents from pain and damage!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Wow, this Em Adjineri is intelligent!!!!! I need to read more Em Adjineri theories!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.