Is there any evidence to support a US government cover up and conspiracy on 9/11?

Now this isnt inteaded to piss anyone off so before some of you start getting your panties in a twist know that it is just a question!!!! ...snoogins

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Best Answer

    You seem like a person who really wants to know the truth and can handle the details necessary to get the job done. It is complex, but their is plenty of incriminating evidence available for those who can muster the stomach and courage to look at it. The following is a summary of some Internet research I conducted a few months ago. The who and the whys are just as incredible to research, but first you must get past what really happened on 9/11.

    ______________________________...

    WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS

    The World Trade Center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition after being attacked by aircraft. The only evidence our government provided that Osama confessed to the crime is fake. Most every video, taken of the towers, show explosive squibs just before the towers imploded. Traces of the explosive "Thermate" was also found at ground zero. Need proof of this, see the evidence at:

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhFJ1...

    PENTAGON

    There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head", found at the crash site, have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine; supporting the witnesses claim. This engine does not fit the commercial Boeing 757 that is said to have hit the Pentagon.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnSrg...

    FLIGHT 93

    United Airlines Flight 93 did not crash as a result of a struggle between the passengers and the alleged hijackers, but in fact was shot down by the North Dakota Air Guards flying F-16's. On orders from Adjutant General Mike Haugen of the State of North Dakota and in opposition to V.P. Cheney's stand down orders, Major Rick Gibney spotted the airline flying by remote control, headed toward Washington D.C. and shot it down. This is why debris, including human remains, rained on areas several miles away from the Shanksville, PA crash site.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhKmC...

  • 3 years ago

    As stated in the story, the 9-11 value concluded that “hijackers crashed planes into the twin Towers.” The national Institute of standards and technologies “filed 10,000 pages of thoughts that discovered fires brought about by way of the crashing planes have been better than adequate to interrupt down the homes.” besides the undeniable fact that, some distance be it for those moonbats to have faith the glaring. instead, communities such because of the fact the scholars for fact contend that the worldwide commerce center became “only approximately honestly introduced down by way of controlled demolitions” and “the government no longer only accepted 9/11 to ensue yet can even have orchestrated those activities to facilitate its political time table.”

  • 1 decade ago

    If there were any such evidence, it would have come out.

    If such evidence really existed, then it would make sense that all of the Congressional attacks on Bush have been mere show-trials to throw people off the bigger story.

    I believe this all to be nonsense. No such reality could stay private among more than one or possibly two sinister people.

    Of course, taking the logical steps to expand the conspiracy to Congress may fuel the obsession of the conspiracy nuts, but what the heck. They won't be taking off their tinfoil hats anytime soon.

    Isn't that right -RKO-?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    civil_av8r you have got to be one of the most naive people on the planet. "The media would jump all over it???" Pulease. With what constitutes "the media" today, you have got to question what is being taught in journalism school. Certainly not investigative journalism. I worked in politics for over 10 years - I saw what was "reported" in the media - as opposed to the truth.

    I've also witnessed skyscraper implosions - up close and personal. 9/11 was a well planned implosion. Explain, if you can, the implo ... I mean "collapse" of the unhit tower. Even the 911 "commission" couldn't.

    There is so much evidence pointing to a conspiracy/cover up on 9/11 that it boggles the mind. Watch the documentary "Loose Change" or "Zeitgeist". Think about who has benefitted from 9/11 ... the man in the cave? No, the Bush family and their associates have benefitted the most from the events of September 11.

    The people of Germany were in denial too ...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Mark A
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    There is no such evidence. If any actually existed, you can bet that the MSM would have been all over it in a heart beat, not to mention the fact that a job like this would have involved hundreds of workers.

    No, this is just the talk of small people who like to make up stories.

  • -RKO-
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    There is sufficient, credible evidence to support the possibility that our government participated in - or at least knew about - the events of 9-11-01. Anyone who believes the government - or the media - is terribly naive; the 9-11 'terrorist attacks' were of benefit to George W. Bush and his family, Dick Cheney and his corporate buddies, and the giant U.S. military-industrial complex that needed to a new 'war' to boost sagging profits - and to bring two 'newcomers' into the government's war trough: the Carlyle Group and Halliburton, BOTH of whom have direct ties to the Bush-Cheney White House. -RKO- 08/13/07

    Source(s): www.zeitgeistmovie.com www.loosechange.com
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You would have to believe that not a single politician or journalist would jump on this story if there were a shred of credible evidence, and I just can't swallow that. Howard Dean would certainly be babbling about it, so would Geraldo. It just ain't so.

  • 1 decade ago

    Watch this...Then answer your own question....

    http://www.911weknow.com/index.php?option=com_cont...

    From shaped charges on girders to seismic activity indicating explosions, you really have to be in denial......

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Tin foil, it's not just for dinner.

  • 1 decade ago

    No, because the media would jump all over it if it was real.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.